Graebert Jennifer K, Henzel M Kristi, Honda Kord S, Bogie Kath M
APT Center of Excellence, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland, Ohio.
APT Center of Excellence, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland, Ohio. ; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, Ohio.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014 Jun 1;3(6):428-437. doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0534.
In a systematic preclinical investigation of ischemic wound healing, we investigated the hypothesis that electrical stimulation (ES) promotes the healing of ischemic wounds. The effects of varying clinically relevant ES variables were evaluated using our modified version of the Gould F344 rat ischemic wound model. Stimulation was delivered using the novel lightweight integrated, single-channel, current-controlled modular surface stimulation (MSS) device. Stepwise variation allowed the effects of five different stimulation paradigms within an appropriate current density range to be studied. Within each group, 8-10 animals were treated for 28 days or until the ischemic wounds were healed and 5 animals were treated for 12 days. Eight rats received sham devices. A quantitative multivariable outcomes assessment procedure was used to evaluate the effects of ES. Ischemic wounds treated with a decreased interpulse interval (IPI) had the highest rate of complete wound closure at 3 weeks. Wounds treated with decreased pulse amplitude (PA) had a lower proportion of closed wounds than sham ischemic wounds and showed sustained inflammation with a lack of wound contraction. Our systematic study of varying ES paradigms using the novel MSS device provides preliminary insight into potential mechanisms of ES in ischemic wound healing. Clinically appropriate ES can more than double the proportion of ischemic wounds closed by 3 weeks in this model. Ninety percent of wounds treated with a decreased IPI healed by 21 days compared with only 29% of ischemic wounds treated with decreased PA, which appears to inhibit healing.
在一项关于缺血性伤口愈合的系统临床前研究中,我们研究了电刺激(ES)促进缺血性伤口愈合的假说。使用我们改良版的Gould F344大鼠缺血性伤口模型评估了不同临床相关ES变量的影响。使用新型轻便集成、单通道、电流控制模块化表面刺激(MSS)装置进行刺激。逐步变化使得能够研究在适当电流密度范围内五种不同刺激模式的影响。每组中,8 - 10只动物接受治疗28天或直至缺血性伤口愈合,5只动物接受治疗12天。八只大鼠接受假装置。采用定量多变量结果评估程序来评估ES的效果。在3周时,采用缩短脉冲间期(IPI)治疗的缺血性伤口完全闭合率最高。采用降低脉冲幅度(PA)治疗的伤口闭合比例低于假缺血性伤口,且显示出持续炎症且缺乏伤口收缩。我们使用新型MSS装置对不同ES模式进行的系统研究为ES在缺血性伤口愈合中的潜在机制提供了初步见解。在该模型中,临床适当的ES可使3周时闭合的缺血性伤口比例增加一倍以上。采用缩短IPI治疗的伤口中有90%在21天内愈合,而采用降低PA治疗的缺血性伤口只有29%愈合,降低PA似乎会抑制愈合。