Sharp Carla, Kalpakci Allison, Mellick William, Venta Amanda, Temple Jeff R
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 126 Heyne Building, Houston, TX, 77204-5022, USA,
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;24(3):283-90. doi: 10.1007/s00787-014-0574-3. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
At least two leading developmental models of borderline personality disorder (BPD) emphasize the role of accurate reflection and understanding of internal states as significant to the development of BPD features (Fonagy, Int J Psycho-Anal 72:639-656, 1991; Linehan, Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder, 1993). The current study used the construct of experiential avoidance (EA) to operationalize avoidance of internal states and sought to examine (1) the concurrent relations between EA and borderline features in a large and diverse community sample; and (2) the prospective relation between EA and borderline features over a 1-year follow-up, controlling for baseline levels of borderline features. N = 881 adolescents recruited from public schools in a large metropolitan area participated in baseline assessments and N = 730 completed follow-up assessments. Two main findings were reported. First, EA was associated with borderline features, depressive, and anxiety symptoms at the bivariate level, but when all variables were considered together, depression and anxiety no longer remained significantly associated with borderline features, suggesting that the relations among these symptom clusters may be accounted for by EA as a cross-cutting underlying psychological process. Second, EA predicted levels of borderline symptoms at 1-year follow-up, controlling for baseline levels of borderline symptoms, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Results are interpreted against the background of developmental theories of borderline personality disorder.
至少有两种主要的边缘型人格障碍(BPD)发展模型强调准确反映和理解内部状态对BPD特征发展的重要作用(Fonagy,《国际精神分析杂志》72:639 - 656,1991;Linehan,《边缘型人格障碍的认知行为治疗》,1993)。本研究使用经验性回避(EA)这一概念来操作化对内部状态的回避,并试图检验:(1)在一个大型且多样化的社区样本中,EA与边缘型特征之间的并发关系;以及(2)在为期1年的随访中,控制边缘型特征的基线水平后,EA与边缘型特征之间的前瞻性关系。从一个大都市地区的公立学校招募的881名青少年参与了基线评估,730名完成了随访评估。报告了两个主要发现。首先,在双变量水平上,EA与边缘型特征、抑郁和焦虑症状相关,但当综合考虑所有变量时,抑郁和焦虑与边缘型特征不再显著相关,这表明这些症状群之间的关系可能由EA作为一个贯穿其中的潜在心理过程来解释。其次,在控制边缘型症状、焦虑和抑郁症状的基线水平后,EA预测了1年随访时的边缘型症状水平。研究结果是在边缘型人格障碍发展理论的背景下进行解释的。