• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Withholding and withdrawing treatment in Canada: implications of the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in the Rasouli case.

作者信息

Downar James, Sibbald Robert W, Bailey Tracey M, Kavanagh Brian P

机构信息

Divisions of Critical Care and Palliative Care (Downar), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Ethics (Sibbald), London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.; John Dossetor Health Ethics Centre and Deparment of Psychiatry (Bailey), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Departments of Critical Care and Anesthesia (Kavanagh), Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2014 Nov 4;186(16):E622-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140054. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1503/cmaj.140054
PMID:24958840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4216277/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Withholding and withdrawing treatment in Canada: implications of the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in the Rasouli case.加拿大的治疗中止与撤除：加拿大最高法院对拉苏利案裁决的影响
CMAJ. 2014 Nov 4;186(16):E622-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140054. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
2
The future of decision-making in critical care after Cuthbertson v. Rasouli.库瑟伯特森诉拉苏利案后重症监护决策的未来。
Can J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;61(10):951-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0215-9. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
3
The impact of the Rasouli decision: a Survey of Canadian intensivists.拉苏利案判决的影响：对加拿大重症监护医生的一项调查。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;42(3):180-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102856. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
4
Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in a patient's best interests: Australian judicial deliberations.在符合患者最佳利益的情况下，对维持生命的治疗方法进行保留和撤销：澳大利亚的司法审议。
Med J Aust. 2014 Nov 3;201(9):545-7. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10874.
5
Supreme Court ruling on the withdrawal of life-sustaining nutrition.最高法院关于停止维持生命的营养供给的裁决。
Br J Nurs. 2018 Sep 20;27(17):1016-1017. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.17.1016.
6
Unilateral withholding and withdrawal of potentially life-sustaining treatment: a violation of dignity under the law in Canada.单方面拒绝和撤掉可能维持生命的治疗：违反加拿大法律规定的尊严。
J Palliat Care. 2004 Autumn;20(3):143-9.
7
Lawfully withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.
Br J Community Nurs. 2013 Dec;18(12):616-9. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2013.18.12.616.
8
An NHS Trust and others v Y and another [2018] UKSC 46: Reducing the Role of the Courts in Treatment Withdrawal.国民保健服务信托基金及其他人诉Y及另一人[2018]英国最高法院案例汇编第46号：减少法院在停止治疗方面的作用
Med Law Rev. 2019 May 1;27(2):330-338. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwy043.
9
Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from minimally conscious patients: who decides?撤除最低意识状态患者的生命维持治疗：由谁来决定？
J Med Pract Manage. 2002 Sep-Oct;18(2):101-3.
10
Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?撤除长期意识障碍患者的临床辅助营养与水分供给：法院是否仍需发挥作用？
J Med Ethics. 2017 Jul;43(7):476-480. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104309. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Do physicians require consent to withhold CPR that they determine to be nonbeneficial?医生决定不进行心肺复苏（CPR）时，是否需要征得同意？
CMAJ. 2019 Nov 25;191(47):E1289-E1290. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191196.
2
A critical review of the factors leading to cardiopulmonary resuscitation as the default position of hospitalized patients in the USA regardless of severity of illness.对导致在美国住院患者无论病情严重程度均将心肺复苏作为默认措施的因素进行的批判性综述。
Int J Emerg Med. 2019 Mar 13;12(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12245-019-0225-z.
3
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Mar;63(3):e150-e152.
4
The demon in : Medical paternalism and linguistic issues in the palliative care setting.其中的症结所在：姑息治疗环境中的医学家长主义与语言问题。
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Mar;63(3):191-194.
5
Mandate to obtain consent for withholding nonbeneficial cardiopulmonary resuscitation is misguided.要求为放弃无效的心肺复苏术获得同意的指令是错误的。
CMAJ. 2016 Mar 1;188(4):245-246. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151205. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective determination of the incidence of perceived inappropriate care in critically ill patients.对重症患者中感知到的不适当护理发生率的前瞻性测定。
Can Respir J. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):165-70. doi: 10.1155/2014/429789. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
2
Physician perspectives on legal processes for resolving end-of-life disputes.医生对解决临终纠纷法律程序的看法。
Healthc Q. 2011;14(2):69-74. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2013.22383.
3
Perceptions of "futile care" among caregivers in intensive care units.重症监护病房中护理人员对“无效治疗”的认知
CMAJ. 2007 Nov 6;177(10):1201-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070144. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
4
"Futile" care: do we provide it? Why? A semistructured, Canada-wide survey of intensive care unit doctors and nurses.“无效”治疗：我们是否提供了这种治疗？原因是什么？一项针对加拿大重症监护病房医生和护士的半结构化全国性调查。
J Crit Care. 2005 Sep;20(3):207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.05.006.
5
Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者家属出现创伤后应激症状的风险。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 1;171(9):987-94. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1295OC. Epub 2005 Jan 21.