Okamoto Kenichi W, Robert Michael A, Gould Fred, Lloyd Alun L
Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Department of Mathematics and Biomathematics Graduate Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America; Department of Biology and the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Jul 3;8(7):e2827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002827. eCollection 2014 Jul.
Introgressing anti-pathogen constructs into wild vector populations could reduce disease transmission. It is generally assumed that such introgression would require linking an anti-pathogen gene with a selfish genetic element or similar technologies. Yet none of the proposed transgenic anti-pathogen gene-drive mechanisms are likely to be implemented as public health measures in the near future. Thus, much attention now focuses instead on transgenic strategies aimed at mosquito population suppression, an approach generally perceived to be practical. By contrast, aiming to replace vector competent mosquito populations with vector incompetent populations by releasing mosquitoes carrying a single anti-pathogen gene without a gene-drive mechanism is widely considered impractical.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we use Skeeter Buster, a previously published stochastic, spatially explicit model of Aedes aegypti to investigate whether a number of approaches for releasing mosquitoes with only an anti-pathogen construct would be efficient and effective in the tropical city of Iquitos, Peru. To assess the performance of such releases using realistic release numbers, we compare the transient and long-term effects of this strategy with two other genetic control strategies that have been developed in Ae. aegypti: release of a strain with female-specific lethality, and a strain with both female-specific lethality and an anti-pathogen gene. We find that releasing mosquitoes carrying only an anti-pathogen construct can substantially decrease vector competence of a natural population, even at release ratios well below that required for the two currently feasible alternatives that rely on population reduction. Finally, although current genetic control strategies based on population reduction are compromised by immigration of wild-type mosquitoes, releasing mosquitoes carrying only an anti-pathogen gene is considerably more robust to such immigration.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Contrary to the widely held view that transgenic control programs aimed at population replacement require linking an anti-pathogen gene to selfish genetic elements, we find releasing mosquitoes in numbers much smaller than those considered necessary for transgenic population reduction can result in comparatively rapid and robust population replacement. In light of this non-intuitive result, directing efforts to improve rearing capacity and logistical support for implementing releases, and reducing the fitness costs of existing recombinant technologies, may provide a viable, alternative route to introgressing anti-pathogen transgenes under field conditions.
将抗病原体构建体渗入野生病媒种群可减少疾病传播。一般认为,这种渗入需要将抗病原体基因与自私遗传元件或类似技术相联系。然而,目前提出的转基因抗病原体基因驱动机制在近期内都不太可能作为公共卫生措施得以实施。因此,现在很多注意力转而集中在旨在抑制蚊子种群数量的转基因策略上,这种方法通常被认为是切实可行的。相比之下,通过释放携带单个无基因驱动机制的抗病原体基因的蚊子,用无传播能力的蚊子种群取代有传播能力的蚊子种群的做法被广泛认为是不切实际的。
方法/主要发现:在此,我们使用先前发表的关于埃及伊蚊的随机、空间明确模型“Skeeter Buster”,来研究在秘鲁伊基托斯热带城市释放仅携带抗病原体构建体的蚊子的多种方法是否高效且有效。为了使用实际释放数量评估此类释放的效果,我们将该策略的短期和长期效果与在埃及伊蚊中开发的其他两种遗传控制策略进行比较:释放具有雌性特异性致死性的品系,以及释放具有雌性特异性致死性和抗病原体基因的品系。我们发现,即使释放比例远低于目前依赖种群数量减少的两种可行替代方案所需的比例,释放仅携带抗病原体构建体的蚊子也能大幅降低自然种群的传播能力。最后,尽管目前基于种群数量减少的遗传控制策略因野生型蚊子的迁入而受到影响,但释放仅携带抗病原体基因的蚊子对这种迁入的抵抗力要强得多。
结论/意义:与广泛持有的观点——旨在种群替代的转基因控制计划需要将抗病原体基因与自私遗传元件相联系——相反,我们发现,释放数量远少于转基因种群数量减少所需数量的蚊子,可导致相对快速且稳健的种群替代。鉴于这一非直观结果,努力提高饲养能力和实施释放的后勤支持,并降低现有重组技术的适合度成本,可能为在野外条件下渗入抗病原体转基因提供一条可行的替代途径。