Legros Mathieu, Xu Chonggang, Morrison Amy, Scott Thomas W, Lloyd Alun L, Gould Fred
Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America ; Department of Entomology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America ; Institut für Integrative Biologie, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 10;8(12):e83354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083354. eCollection 2013.
Recently there have been significant advances in research on genetic strategies to control populations of disease-vectoring insects. Some of these strategies use the gene drive properties of selfish genetic elements to spread physically linked anti-pathogen genes into local vector populations. Because of the potential of these selfish elements to spread through populations, control approaches based on these strategies must be carefully evaluated to ensure a balance between the desirable spread of the refractoriness-conferring genetic cargo and the avoidance of potentially unwanted outcomes such as spread to non-target populations. There is also a need to develop better estimates of the economics of such releases. We present here an evaluation of two such strategies using a biologically realistic mathematical model that simulates the resident Aedes aegypti mosquito population of Iquitos, Peru. One strategy uses the selfish element Medea, a non-limited element that could permanently spread over a large geographic area; the other strategy relies on Killer-Rescue genetic constructs, and has been predicted to have limited spatial and temporal spread. We simulate various operational approaches for deploying these genetic strategies, and quantify the optimal number of released transgenic mosquitoes needed to achieve definitive spread of Medea-linked genes and/or high frequencies of Killer-Rescue-associated elements. We show that for both strategies the most efficient approach for achieving spread of anti-pathogen genes within three years is generally to release adults of both sexes in multiple releases over time. Even though females in these releases should not transmit disease, there could be public concern over such releases, making the less efficient male-only release more practical. This study provides guidelines for operational approaches to population replacement genetic strategies, as well as illustrates the use of detailed spatial models to assist in safe and efficient implementation of such novel genetic strategies.
最近,在控制病媒昆虫种群的遗传策略研究方面取得了重大进展。其中一些策略利用自私遗传元件的基因驱动特性,将物理连锁的抗病原体基因传播到当地病媒种群中。由于这些自私元件有可能在种群中传播,基于这些策略的控制方法必须经过仔细评估,以确保在赋予抗性的遗传物质的理想传播与避免潜在的不良后果(如传播到非目标种群)之间取得平衡。还需要更好地评估此类释放的经济性。我们在此使用一个生物学上现实的数学模型,对秘鲁伊基托斯当地的埃及伊蚊种群进行模拟,评估两种这样的策略。一种策略使用自私元件美狄亚(Medea),这是一种不受限制的元件,可以在很大的地理区域永久传播;另一种策略依赖于杀手 - 救援基因构建体,预计其空间和时间传播有限。我们模拟了部署这些遗传策略的各种操作方法,并量化了实现与美狄亚相关基因的最终传播和/或杀手 - 救援相关元件的高频率所需释放的转基因蚊子的最佳数量。我们表明,对于这两种策略,在三年内实现抗病原体基因传播的最有效方法通常是随着时间的推移多次释放雌雄成虫。尽管这些释放中的雌性不应传播疾病,但公众可能会对此类释放表示担忧,这使得效率较低的仅释放雄性的方法更具实际可行性。这项研究为种群替代遗传策略的操作方法提供了指导方针,同时也说明了使用详细的空间模型来协助安全有效地实施此类新型遗传策略。