Mizukami Takuo, Momose Haruka, Kuramitsu Madoka, Takizawa Kazuya, Araki Kumiko, Furuhata Keiko, Ishii Ken J, Hamaguchi Isao, Yamaguchi Kazunari
Laboratory of Blood and Vaccine safety, Department of Safety Research on Blood and Biologicals, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Laboratory of Adjuvant Innovation, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO), Osaka, Japan; Laboratory of Vaccine Science, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center (WPI-IFREC), Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 10;9(7):e101835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101835. eCollection 2014.
Vaccines are beneficial and universal tools to prevent infectious disease. Thus, safety of vaccines is strictly evaluated in the preclinical phase of trials and every vaccine batch must be tested by the National Control Laboratories according to the guidelines published by each country. Despite many vaccine production platforms and methods, animal testing for safety evaluation is unchanged thus far. We recently developed a systems biological approach to vaccine safety evaluation where identification of specific biomarkers in a rat pre-clinical study evaluated the safety of vaccines for pandemic H5N1 influenza including Irf7, Lgals9, Lgalsbp3, Cxcl11, Timp1, Tap2, Psmb9, Psme1, Tapbp, C2, Csf1, Mx2, Zbp1, Ifrd1, Trafd1, Cxcl9, β2m, Npc1, Ngfr and Ifi47. The current study evaluated whether these 20 biomarkers could evaluate the safety, batch-to-batch and manufacturer-to-manufacturer consistency of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine using a multiplex gene detection system. When we evaluated the influenza HA vaccine (HAv) from four different manufactures, the biomarker analysis correlated to findings from conventional animal use tests, such as abnormal toxicity test. In addition, sensitivity of toxicity detection and differences in HAvs were higher and more accurate than with conventional methods. Despite a slight decrease in body weight caused by HAv from manufacturer B that was not statistically significant, our results suggest that HAv from manufacturer B is significantly different than the other HAvs tested with regard to Lgals3bp, Tapbp, Lgals9, Irf7 and C2 gene expression in rat lungs. Using the biomarkers confirmed in this study, we predicted batch-to-batch consistency and safety of influenza vaccines within 2 days compared with the conventional safety test, which takes longer. These biomarkers will facilitate the future development of new influenza vaccines and provide an opportunity to develop in vitro methods of evaluating batch-to-batch consistency and vaccine safety as an alternative to animal testing.
疫苗是预防传染病的有益且通用的工具。因此,疫苗安全性在临床试验的临床前阶段会得到严格评估,并且每个疫苗批次都必须由国家控制实验室根据各国发布的指南进行检测。尽管有许多疫苗生产平台和方法,但迄今为止,用于安全性评估的动物试验并无变化。我们最近开发了一种系统生物学方法用于疫苗安全性评估,即在大鼠临床前研究中识别特定生物标志物,以此评估大流行H5N1流感疫苗的安全性,这些生物标志物包括Irf7、Lgals9、Lgalsbp3、Cxcl11、Timp1、Tap2、Psmb9、Psme1、Tapbp、C2、Csf1、Mx2、Zbp1、Ifrd1、Trafd1、Cxcl9、β2m、Npc1、Ngfr和Ifi47。本研究评估了这20种生物标志物能否使用多重基因检测系统评估季节性三价流感疫苗的安全性、批次间一致性以及不同生产商之间的一致性。当我们评估来自四个不同生产商的流感HA疫苗(HAv)时,生物标志物分析与传统动物使用试验(如异常毒性试验)的结果相关。此外,毒性检测的灵敏度以及HAv之间的差异比传统方法更高且更准确。尽管生产商B的HAv导致体重略有下降,但无统计学意义,我们的结果表明,就大鼠肺中Lgals3bp、Tapbp、Lgals9、Irf7和C2基因表达而言,生产商B的HAv与其他测试的HAv存在显著差异。使用本研究中确认的生物标志物,与耗时更长的传统安全性测试相比,我们在2天内预测了流感疫苗的批次间一致性和安全性。这些生物标志物将促进新型流感疫苗的未来开发,并提供机会开发体外方法来评估批次间一致性和疫苗安全性,以替代动物试验。