Suppr超能文献

跨成年期测量未来时间视角:一个简短多维问卷的编制与评估。

Measuring future time perspective across adulthood: development and evaluation of a brief multidimensional questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.

Division of Psychology, School of Social and International Studies, University of Bradford, UK.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2014 Dec;54(6):1075-88. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu076. Epub 2014 Jul 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Despite calls for the consideration of future time perspective (FTP) as a multidimensional construct, mostly unidimensional measurement instruments have been used. This study had two objectives: (a) to develop a brief multidimensional questionnaire for assessing FTP in adulthood and evaluate its psychometric properties; and (b) to examine age associations and age-group differences of the dimensions of FTP.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were collected from 625 community-residing adults between the ages of 18 and 93, representing young, middle-aged, and older adults. The psychometric evaluation involved exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory FA (CFA), reliability and validity analyses, and measurement invariance testing. Zero-order and partial correlations were used to examine the association of the dimensions of FTP with age, and multivariate analysis of variance was used to examine age-group differences.

RESULTS

EFA and CFA supported a three-factor solution: Future as Open, Future as Limited, and Future as Ambiguous. Metric measurement invariance for this factor structure was confirmed across the three age groups. Reliability and validity analyses provided evidence of sound psychometric properties of the brief questionnaire. Age was negatively associated with Future as Open and positively associated with Future as Limited. Young adults exhibited significantly greater ambiguity toward the future than middle-aged or older adults.

IMPLICATIONS

This study provides evidence in support of the psychometric properties of a new brief multidimensional FTP scale. It also provides evidence for a pattern of age associations and age-group differences consistent with life-span developmental theory.

摘要

研究目的

尽管人们呼吁将未来时间透视(FTP)视为多维结构,但大多使用的是单维测量工具。本研究有两个目的:(a)开发一个简短的多维成人 FTP 评估问卷,并评估其心理测量特性;(b)检验 FTP 各维度的年龄相关性和年龄组差异。

设计与方法

数据来自年龄在 18 至 93 岁之间的 625 名社区居住成年人,包括年轻人、中年人、老年人。心理测量评估包括探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)、可靠性和有效性分析以及测量不变性检验。零阶和偏相关用于检验 FTP 各维度与年龄的相关性,多变量方差分析用于检验年龄组差异。

结果

EFA 和 CFA 支持三因素模型:未来开放、未来有限和未来模糊。该因素结构在三个年龄组中的度量测量不变性得到了确认。可靠性和有效性分析提供了证据,证明了简短问卷具有良好的心理测量特性。年龄与未来开放呈负相关,与未来有限呈正相关。年轻人对未来的模糊性明显大于中年人或老年人。

结论

本研究为新的简短多维 FTP 量表的心理测量特性提供了证据。它还为与生命历程发展理论一致的年龄相关性和年龄组差异模式提供了证据。

相似文献

1
Measuring future time perspective across adulthood: development and evaluation of a brief multidimensional questionnaire.
Gerontologist. 2014 Dec;54(6):1075-88. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu076. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
8
Successful Aging from the Viewpoint of Older Adults: Development of a Brief Successful Aging Inventory (SAI).
Gerontology. 2017;63(4):359-371. doi: 10.1159/000455252. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
9
Psychometric properties of the Feeling of Unsafety Scale-Arabic in general population adults.
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 28;13:1491691. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1491691. eCollection 2025.
10
Examining the factorial validity of the Quality of Life Scale.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Feb 18;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01292-5.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Sleep in everyday life - relationship to mood and performance in young and older adults: a study protocol.
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1264881. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1264881. eCollection 2023.
3
Disentangling Aging and Mood Effects on Emotional Memory.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Aug 26;16:944363. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.944363. eCollection 2022.
4
Development and validation of a scale to evaluate students' future impact perception related to the coronavirus pandemic (C-19FIPS).
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 19;16(11):e0260248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260248. eCollection 2021.
5
Age patterns in subjective well-being are partially accounted for by psychological and social factors associated with aging.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 2;15(12):e0242664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242664. eCollection 2020.
7
Future Time Perspective in Mid-to-Later Life: The Role of Personality.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Feb 17;76(3):524-533. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz110.
8
Age Differences in Intertemporal Choice: The Role of Task Type, Outcome Characteristics, and Covariates.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):85-95. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz097.
9
Assessing the Psychological Impact of Genetic Susceptibility Testing.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 May;49 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S38-S43. doi: 10.1002/hast.1015.
10
Future Time Perspective: Time Horizons and Beyond.
GeroPsych (Bern). 2018 Sep;31(3):163-167. doi: 10.1024/1662-9647/a000194. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties and population-based norms of the Life Orientation Test Revised (LOT-R).
Br J Health Psychol. 2012 May;17(2):432-45. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02046.x. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
2
Adults' future time perspective predicts engagement in physical activity.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jul;67(4):413-6. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr118. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
4
"They" are old but "I" feel younger: age-group dissociation as a self-protective strategy in old age.
Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):153-163. doi: 10.1037/a0024887. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
5
Future orientation, impulsivity, and problem behaviors: a longitudinal moderation model.
Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1633-45. doi: 10.1037/a0025327. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
6
Positivity effects in older adults' perception of facial emotion: the role of future time perspective.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Mar;67(2):150-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr079. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
8
Time perspective and attitude-behaviour consistency in future-oriented behaviours.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;49(Pt 1):69-89. doi: 10.1348/014466608X401875. Epub 2009 Feb 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验