Suppr超能文献

自然发生的犬利什曼病预防性控制措施疗效的系统评价,第一部分:疫苗接种

A systematic review of the efficacy of prophylactic control measures for naturally-occurring canine leishmaniosis, part I: vaccinations.

作者信息

Wylie C E, Carbonell-Antoñanzas M, Aiassa E, Dhollander S, Zagmutt F J, Brodbelt D C, Solano-Gallego L

机构信息

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animal, Campus Bellaterra, Edifici V, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animal, Campus Bellaterra, Edifici V, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Prev Vet Med. 2014 Nov 1;117(1):7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jul 11.

Abstract

Canine leishmaniosis (CanL) is an important zoonotic disease; however, the efficacy of available vaccines for the prevention of naturally-occurring Leishmania infantum (L. infantum) infection in dogs remains unclear. The objective of this review was to determine the efficacy of currently available vaccines to prevent naturally-occurring L. infantum infection in dogs. Four bibliographic databases (CAB Direct 2011, Web of Science 2011, U.S. National Library of Medicine 2011 and Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde) were searched along with eight sets of conference proceedings and the International Veterinary Information Service (IVIS) database, from 1980 to November 2012. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised clinical trials (NRCTs), cohort studies and case-control studies that investigated vaccine efficacy for natural L. infantum infection in dogs were eligible for inclusion. Two review authors independently assessed each study against the inclusion criteria, independently extracted relevant data from all included studies and assessed the risk of methodological shortcomings in each individual study. The odds ratio (OR) and absolute risk reduction (ARR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference for continuous outcomes were calculated. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity of the studies identified. The search was conducted for all mitigations for CanL and yielded the title and abstract of 937 articles, from which 84 articles were screened based on full text. Twelve studies on vaccinations (five RCTs, seven NRCTs) were identified. Ten studies were at a high risk of methodological shortcomings, whilst two were at an unclear risk. The use of 200 μg ALM protein, Leishmune(®), CaniLeish(®), LiESAp with MDP, and ALM with BCG tended to significantly reduce the proportion of dogs infected with L. infantum based on either parasitological or serological evidence. The use of lyophilized protein vaccine significantly increased the proportion of dogs infected with L. infantum based on either parasitological or serological evidence. There is peer-reviewed evidence that control measures are effective in preventing CanL with the results suggesting that between 6 and 54% of infections could be prevented with vaccination. However, this evidence is based on a small number of RCTs, all of which are either at high or unclear risk of methodological shortcomings. Well-designed, adequately powered and properly reported randomised clinical trials are needed to clearly establish efficacy of vaccines as CanL control measures.

摘要

犬利什曼病(CanL)是一种重要的人畜共患病;然而,现有疫苗预防犬自然感染婴儿利什曼原虫(L. infantum)的效果仍不明确。本综述的目的是确定当前可用疫苗预防犬自然感染L. infantum的效果。检索了四个文献数据库(CAB Direct 2011、Web of Science 2011、美国国立医学图书馆2011以及拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学文献数据库),以及八套会议论文集和国际兽医信息服务(IVIS)数据库,检索时间跨度为1980年至2012年11月。纳入了调查疫苗预防犬自然感染L. infantum效果的随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机临床试验(NRCT)、队列研究和病例对照研究。两位综述作者根据纳入标准独立评估每项研究,独立从所有纳入研究中提取相关数据,并评估每项研究方法学缺陷的风险。计算二分法结局的比值比(OR)和绝对风险降低率(ARR)以及连续结局的均值差。由于所确定研究的异质性,未进行荟萃分析。对CanL的所有缓解措施进行了检索,得到937篇文章的标题和摘要,基于全文从中筛选出84篇文章。确定了12项关于疫苗接种的研究(5项RCT、7项NRCT)。10项研究存在较高的方法学缺陷风险,2项研究风险不明确。基于寄生虫学或血清学证据,使用200μg ALM蛋白、Leishmune®、CaniLeish®、LiESAp与MDP联合以及ALM与卡介苗联合,往往能显著降低感染L. infantum的犬的比例。基于寄生虫学或血清学证据,使用冻干蛋白疫苗显著增加了感染L. infantum的犬比例。有经过同行评审的证据表明,控制措施在预防CanL方面有效,结果表明接种疫苗可预防6%至54%的感染。然而,该证据基于少数RCT,所有这些研究要么存在较高的方法学缺陷风险,要么风险不明确。需要设计良好、样本量充足且报告恰当的随机临床试验,以明确确定疫苗作为CanL控制措施的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验