Department of Nature Conservation, Mangosuthu University of Technology, P.O. Box 12363, Jacobs, KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4026, South Africa.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:423751. doi: 10.1155/2014/423751. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
Background. This study was aimed at evaluating the antibacterial activity of the acetone extract of A. mearnsii and its interactions with antibiotics against some resistant bacterial strains. Methods. The antibacterial susceptibility testing was determined by agar diffusion and macrobroth dilution methods while the checkerboard method was used for the determination of synergy between the antibiotics and the extract. Results. The results showed that the susceptibility of the different bacterial isolates was concentration dependent for the extract and the different antibiotics. With the exception of S. marcescens, the inhibition zones of the extract produced by 20 mg/mL ranged between 18 and 32 mm. While metronidazole did not inhibit any of the bacterial isolates, all the antibiotics and their combinations, except for ciprofloxacin and its combination, did not inhibit Enterococcus faecalis. The antibacterial combinations were more of being antagonistic than of being synergistic in the agar diffusion assay. From the macrobroth dilution, the extract and the antibiotics exerted a varied degree of inhibitory effect on the test organisms. The MIC values of the acetone extract which are in mg/mL are lower than those of the different antibiotics which are in μg/mL. From the checkerboard assay, the antibacterial combinations showed varied degrees of interactions including synergism, additive, indifference, and antagonism interactions. While antagonistic and additive interactions were 14.44%, indifference interaction was 22.22% and synergistic interaction was 37.78% of the antibacterial combinations against the test isolates. While the additivity/indifference interactions indicated no interactions, the antagonistic interaction may be considered as a negative interaction that could result in toxicity and suboptimal bioactivity. Conclusion. The synergistic effects of the herbal-drug combinations may be harnessed for the discovery and development of more rational evidence-based drug combinations with optimized efficiency in the prevention of multidrug resistance and therapy of multifactorial diseases.
背景。本研究旨在评估 A. mearnsii 的丙酮提取物的抗菌活性及其与抗生素对一些耐药菌株的相互作用。
方法。采用琼脂扩散和宏观肉汤稀释法测定抗菌药敏试验,棋盘法测定抗生素与提取物之间的协同作用。
结果。结果表明,提取物和不同抗生素对不同细菌分离株的敏感性呈浓度依赖性。除 S. marcescens 外,20mg/mL 提取物产生的抑菌圈直径在 18 至 32mm 之间。虽然甲硝唑不能抑制任何细菌分离株,但除环丙沙星及其组合外,所有抗生素及其组合均不能抑制粪肠球菌。琼脂扩散试验中,抗菌组合多为拮抗作用,而不是协同作用。从宏观肉汤稀释试验中可以看出,提取物和抗生素对试验菌有不同程度的抑制作用。以 mg/mL 为单位的丙酮提取物的 MIC 值低于以 μg/mL 为单位的不同抗生素的 MIC 值。从棋盘试验来看,抗菌组合表现出不同程度的相互作用,包括协同作用、相加作用、无关作用和拮抗作用。拮抗和相加作用分别占抗菌组合对试验分离株的 14.44%、22.22%,无关作用占 37.78%,协同作用占 37.78%。虽然相加/无关作用表明无相互作用,但拮抗作用可能被认为是一种负面相互作用,可能导致毒性和次优的生物活性。
结论。草药-药物组合的协同作用可以被利用来发现和开发更合理的基于证据的药物组合,以优化预防多药耐药和治疗多因素疾病的效率。