Hunter Judith P, Stinson Jennifer, Campbell Fiona, Stevens Bonnie, Wagner Susan J, Simmons Brian, White Meghan, van Wyk Margaret
Pain Res Manag. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):e12-20. doi: 10.1155/2015/159580. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
Health care trainees⁄students lack knowledge and skills for the comprehensive clinical assessment and management of pain. Moreover, most teaching has been limited to classroom settings within each profession.
To develop and evaluate the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of the 'Pain-Interprofessional Education (IPE) Placement', a five-week pain IPE implemented in the clinical setting. The utility (content validity, readability, internal consistency and practical considerations) of the outcome measures was also evaluated.
A convenience sample of 21 trainees from eight professions was recruited over three Pain-IPE Placement cycles. Pre- and postcurriculum assessment included: pain knowledge (Pediatric Pain Knowledge and Attitudes Survey), IPE attitudes (Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale [IEPS]) and IPE competencies (Interprofessional Care Core Competencies Global Rating Scales [IPC-GRS]), and qualitative feedback on process⁄acceptability.
Recruitment and retention met expectations. Qualitative feedback was excellent. IPE measures (IEPS and IPC-GRS) exhibited satisfactory utility. Postcurriculum scores improved significantly: IEPS, P<0.05; IPC-GRS constructs, P<0.01; and competencies, P<0.001. However, the Pediatric Pain Knowledge and Attitudes Survey exhibited poor utility in professions without formal pharmacology training. Scores improved in the remaining professions (n=14; P<0.01).
There was significant improvement in educational outcomes. The IEPS and IPC-GRS are useful measures of IPE-related learning. At more advanced training levels, a single pain-knowledge questionnaire may not accurately reflect learning across diverse professions.
The Pain-IPE Placement is a successful collaborative learning model within a clinical context that successfully changed interprofessional competencies. The present study represents a first step at defining and assessing change in interprofessional competencies gained from Pain-IPE.
医疗保健实习生/学生缺乏全面临床评估和管理疼痛的知识与技能。此外,大多数教学局限于各专业内部的课堂环境。
开发并评估“疼痛跨专业教育(IPE)实习”的可行性和初步成果,这是一项在临床环境中实施的为期五周的疼痛IPE。还评估了结果测量指标的效用(内容效度、可读性、内部一致性和实际考量)。
在三个疼痛IPE实习周期中,从八个专业招募了21名实习生作为便利样本。课程前后评估包括:疼痛知识(儿科疼痛知识与态度调查)、IPE态度(跨学科教育认知量表[IEPS])和IPE能力(跨专业护理核心能力全球评分量表[IPC-GRS]),以及对过程/可接受性的定性反馈。
招募和留用情况符合预期。定性反馈良好。IPE测量指标(IEPS和IPC-GRS)显示出令人满意的效用。课程后分数显著提高:IEPS,P<0.05;IPC-GRS结构,P<0.01;能力,P<0.001。然而,儿科疼痛知识与态度调查在没有接受过正规药理学培训的专业中效用较差。其余专业(n = 14;P<0.01)的分数有所提高。
教育成果有显著改善。IEPS和IPC-GRS是与IPE相关学习的有用测量指标。在更高的培训水平上,单一的疼痛知识问卷可能无法准确反映不同专业的学习情况。
疼痛IPE实习是临床背景下成功的协作学习模式,成功改变了跨专业能力。本研究是定义和评估从疼痛IPE获得的跨专业能力变化的第一步。