• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药学教育消费者的四项权利。

Four rights of the pharmacy educational consumer.

作者信息

Cain Jeff, Noel Zachary, Smith Kelly M, Romanelli Frank

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Aug 15;78(6):115. doi: 10.5688/ajpe786115.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe786115
PMID:25147387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4140481/
Abstract

Professional students and their families invest a significant amount of time and finances to obtain a degree. While education is not a typical consumer good and should not be treated as such, there are certain expectations that colleges and schools should be prepared to meet. This article contrasts academic entitlement issues with 4 fundamental rights underpinning colleges' and schools' fiduciary responsibilities to students. The authors submit that students, in their roles as higher education consumers, have the following rights: (1) to have the opportunity to learn, (2) to learn from faculty members dedicated to best teaching practices, (3) to learn within a curriculum designed to prepare them for the profession, and (4) to have access to resources necessary to succeed.

摘要

专业学生及其家庭投入了大量的时间和金钱来获取学位。虽然教育并非典型的消费品,也不应被视为消费品,但学院和学校应做好准备满足某些期望。本文将学术权利问题与支撑学院和学校对学生的受托责任的四项基本权利进行了对比。作者认为,学生作为高等教育消费者,享有以下权利:(1)有学习的机会;(2)向致力于最佳教学实践的教师学习;(3)在为其职业发展做准备的课程体系内学习;(4)获得成功所需的资源。

相似文献

1
Four rights of the pharmacy educational consumer.药学教育消费者的四项权利。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Aug 15;78(6):115. doi: 10.5688/ajpe786115.
2
Academic entitlement in pharmacy education.药学教育中的学术权利。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Dec 12;76(10):189. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7610189.
3
Is a pharmacy student the customer or the product?药学专业学生是顾客还是产品?
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Feb 12;78(1):3. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7813.
4
The Role of Consumerism in Pharmacy Education.消费者主义在药学教育中的作用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Jun;88(6):100708. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100708. Epub 2024 May 7.
5
Mixing metaphors in pharmacy education is a bad solution for students.在药学教育中混合使用隐喻对学生来说不是一个好办法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Dec 15;78(10):175. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7810175.
6
Toolkit for US colleges/schools of pharmacy to prepare learners for careers in academia.美国药学院校帮助学习者为学术生涯做好准备的工具包。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Sep;9(5):750-762. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
7
Academic entitlement and academic performance in graduating pharmacy students.即将毕业的药学专业学生的学术特权与学业表现。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Aug 15;78(6):116. doi: 10.5688/ajpe786116.
8
Teaching evaluation practices in colleges and schools of pharmacy.药学院校的教学评估实践。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Oct 1;73(6):103. doi: 10.5688/aj7306103.
9
Educating Pharmacy Students to Improve Quality (EPIQ) in colleges and schools of pharmacy.在药学院校中培养药学学生提高质量(EPIQ)。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Aug 10;76(6):109. doi: 10.5688/ajpe766109.
10
The taxonomy of professionalism: reframing the academic pursuit of professional development.专业主义的分类学:重新构建专业发展的学术追求。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Jul 10;73(4):68. doi: 10.5688/aj730468.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing academic entitlement in pharmacy students: insights from Saudi Arabia.评估药学专业学生的学术特权:来自沙特阿拉伯的见解。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 9;12:1553233. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1553233. eCollection 2025.
2
Using Focus Groups to Explore Evolving Perceptions of Student Pharmacists' Curricular Experiences.利用焦点小组探索学生药剂师课程体验的不断变化的认知。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7122. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7122.
3
Development and Implementation of an Advising Program's Meet-and-Greet Session.咨询项目见面会的开发与实施
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Dec 25;79(10):150. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7910150.
4
The Disconnect.脱节。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Dec 25;79(10):146. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7910146.
5
Report of the 2014-2015 Academic Affairs Standing Committee: Addressing Affordability, Accessibility, and Accountability.2014 - 2015学年学术事务常务委员会报告:应对可承受性、可及性和问责制问题。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Oct 25;79(8):S13. doi: 10.5688/ajpe798S13.
6
Does a transition in education equate to a transition in practice? Thai stakeholder's perceptions of the introduction of the Doctor of Pharmacy programme.教育的转变是否等同于实践的转变?泰国利益相关者对药学博士项目引入的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Nov 19;15:205. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0473-4.
7
What Can We Learn from TED Talks?我们能从TED演讲中学到什么?
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Aug 25;79(6):92. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79692.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-authorship in pharmacy education.药学教育中的自我认同。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):69. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77469.
2
Academic entitlement in pharmacy education.药学教育中的学术权利。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Dec 12;76(10):189. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7610189.
3
To record or not to record?记录还是不记录?
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Oct 10;75(8):149. doi: 10.5688/ajpe758149.
4
Eliminating bottlenecks to learning among pharmacy students.消除药学专业学生学习中的瓶颈。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Feb 10;74(1):15. doi: 10.5688/aj740115.
5
Why do we still lecture?我们为什么还在讲课?
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):137. doi: 10.5688/aj7308137.
6
Incorporating an immunization certificate program into the pharmacy curriculum.将免疫接种证书计划纳入药学课程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Feb 19;73(1):7. doi: 10.5688/aj730107.
7
Pharmacist involvement with immunizations: a decade of professional advancement.药剂师参与免疫接种:十年的专业发展。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2006 Mar-Apr;46(2):168-79; quiz 179-82. doi: 10.1331/154434506776180621.
8
Students are not customers: a better model for medical education.
Acad Med. 1999 Nov;74(11):1172-86. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199911000-00009.