Frauscher Birgit, Gabelia David, Biermayr Marlene, Stefani Ambra, Hackner Heinz, Mitterling Thomas, Poewe Werner, Högl Birgit
Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sleep. 2014 Oct 1;37(10):1663-71. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4076.
Rapid eye movement sleep without atonia (RWA) is the polysomnographic hallmark of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). To partially overcome the disadvantages of manual RWA scoring, which is time consuming but essential for the accurate diagnosis of RBD, we aimed to validate software specifically developed and integrated with polysomnography for RWA detection against the gold standard of manual RWA quantification.
Academic referral center sleep laboratory.
Polysomnographic recordings of 20 patients with RBD and 60 healthy volunteers were analyzed.
N/A.
Motor activity during REM sleep was quantified manually and computer assisted (with and without artifact detection) according to Sleep Innsbruck Barcelona (SINBAR) criteria for the mentalis ("any," phasic, tonic electromyographic [EMG] activity) and the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle (phasic EMG activity). Computer-derived indices (with and without artifact correction) for "any," phasic, tonic mentalis EMG activity, phasic FDS EMG activity, and the SINBAR index ("any" mentalis + phasic FDS) correlated well with the manually derived indices (all Spearman rhos 0.66-0.98). In contrast with computerized scoring alone, computerized scoring plus manual artifact correction (median duration 5.4 min) led to a significant reduction of false positives for "any" mentalis (40%), phasic mentalis (40.6%), and the SINBAR index (41.2%). Quantification of tonic mentalis and phasic FDS EMG activity was not influenced by artifact correction.
The computer algorithm used here appears to be a promising tool for REM sleep behavior disorder detection in both research and clinical routine. A short check for plausibility of automatic detection should be a basic prerequisite for this and all other available computer algorithms.
快速眼动睡眠无张力(RWA)是快速眼动睡眠行为障碍(RBD)的多导睡眠图特征。为了部分克服手动RWA评分的缺点(这一过程耗时但对RBD的准确诊断至关重要),我们旨在针对手动RWA量化的金标准,验证专门开发并与多导睡眠图集成用于检测RWA的软件。
学术转诊中心睡眠实验室。
分析了20例RBD患者和60名健康志愿者的多导睡眠图记录。
无。
根据因斯布鲁克 - 巴塞罗那睡眠标准(SINBAR)对颏肌(“任何”、时相性、紧张性肌电图[EMG]活动)和指浅屈肌(FDS)肌肉(时相性EMG活动),手动并通过计算机辅助(有和无伪迹检测)对快速眼动睡眠期间的运动活动进行量化。计算机得出的“任何(活动)”、时相性、紧张性颏肌EMG活动、时相性FDS EMG活动以及SINBAR指数(“任何”颏肌 + 时相性FDS)的指标(有和无伪迹校正)与手动得出的指标相关性良好(所有斯皮尔曼相关系数为0.66 - 0.98)。与单独的计算机评分相比,计算机评分加上手动伪迹校正(中位持续时间5.4分钟)导致“任何”颏肌(40%)、时相性颏肌(40.6%)和SINBAR指数(41.2%)的假阳性显著减少。紧张性颏肌和时相性FDS EMG活动的量化不受伪迹校正的影响。
此处使用的计算机算法似乎是研究和临床常规中检测快速眼动睡眠行为障碍的一个有前景的工具。对自动检测的合理性进行简短检查应该是此算法以及所有其他可用计算机算法的基本前提。