• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么不直接问问住院医生呢?

Why not just ask the resident?

作者信息

Housen Patricia, Shannon George R, Simon Barbara, Edelen Maria Orlando, Cadogan Mary P, Jones Malia, Buchanan Joan, Saliba Debra

机构信息

Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Nov;35(11):40-9. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20091001-01. Epub 2009 Nov 6.

DOI:10.3928/00989134-20091001-01
PMID:19904856
Abstract

This research evaluated a draft preference assessment tool (draft-PAT) designed to replace the current Customary Routine section of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for nursing homes. The draft-PAT was tested with a sample of nursing home residents to evaluate survey-level administration time and noncompletion rates, as well as item-level nonresponse rates, response distributions, and test-retest reliability. Modifications to the draft-PAT were then retested with a subsample of residents. Completion times were brief (generally less than 10 minutes), and only a small percentage of residents were unable to complete the interview. Item-level nonresponse rates were low for the draft-PAT (0% to 8%) and even lower during retesting for items advanced to the national field trial (0% to 4%). Item response distributions indicated reasonable use of all options across both testing occasions, and item-level test-retest reliability was high. This study found that nursing home residents can reliably report their preferences. Eighteen items from the modified draft-PAT were advanced to the national field trial of the MDS 3.0. Inclusion of the PAT in the MDS revision underscores increased emphasis on including residents' voice in the assessment process.

摘要

本研究评估了一种旨在取代疗养院最低数据集(MDS)当前常规部分的偏好评估工具草案(草案 - PAT)。该草案 - PAT在一组疗养院居民样本上进行了测试,以评估调查层面的管理时间和未完成率,以及项目层面的无回答率、回答分布和重测信度。然后,对草案 - PAT的修改版本在一部分居民子样本上进行了重新测试。完成时间很短(通常少于10分钟),只有一小部分居民无法完成访谈。草案 - PAT的项目层面无回答率较低(0%至8%),在推进到全国现场试验的项目重新测试期间甚至更低(0%至4%)。项目回答分布表明在两次测试中所有选项都得到了合理使用,并且项目层面的重测信度很高。本研究发现疗养院居民能够可靠地报告他们的偏好。修改后的草案 - PAT中的18个项目被推进到MDS 3.0的全国现场试验。将PAT纳入MDS修订版突出了在评估过程中对纳入居民意见的日益重视。

相似文献

1
Why not just ask the resident?为什么不直接问问住院医生呢?
J Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Nov;35(11):40-9. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20091001-01. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
2
Which long-term care residents should be asked to complete a customer satisfaction survey?哪些长期护理机构的居民应该被要求填写客户满意度调查问卷?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Sep-Oct;4(5):257-63. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000083446.03657.4F.
3
Using the minimum data set to select nursing home residents for interview about pain.使用最小数据集来选择疗养院居民进行疼痛方面的访谈。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Dec;52(12):2057-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52565.x.
4
Making the investment count: revision of the Minimum Data Set for nursing homes, MDS 3.0.投资有回报:修订疗养院最低数据集,MDS 3.0。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Sep;13(7):602-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
5
Nursing home assessment of cognitive impairment: development and testing of a brief instrument of mental status.养老院认知障碍评估:一种简短精神状态评估工具的开发与测试
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Nov;56(11):2069-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01944.x.
6
Transitioning residents from nursing facilities to community living: who wants to leave?将疗养院的住院患者转移到社区生活:谁想离开?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jan;56(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01566.x.
7
The National Nursing Home Survey: 2004 overview.《国家疗养院调查:2004年概述》
Vital Health Stat 13. 2009 Jun(167):1-155.
8
Validation of CARE-Q in residential aged-care: rating of importance of caring behaviours from an e-cohort sub-study.CARE-Q在老年护理院的验证:来自电子队列子研究的护理行为重要性评分
J Clin Nurs. 2009 May;18(10):1501-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02723.x.
9
Applying Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Hong Kong nursing homes.在香港养老院应用资源利用分组系统(RUG-III)。
Can J Aging. 2008 Fall;27(3):233-9. doi: 10.3138/cja.27.3.233.
10
Resident, nursing home, and state factors affecting the reliability of Minimum Data Set quality measures.影响最小数据集质量指标可靠性的居民、养老院和州因素。
Am J Med Qual. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):229-40. doi: 10.1177/1062860609332510. Epub 2009 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Wishes and Needs of Nursing Home Residents: A Scoping Review.养老院居民的愿望和需求:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 6;10(5):854. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050854.
2
The Association Between Preference Satisfaction and Satisfaction with Overall Care for Nursing Home Residents.养老机构居民偏好满足度与整体护理满意度之间的关系。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2022 Sep 3;34(5):707-722. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2022.2029265. Epub 2022 May 1.
3
Assessing Social Functioning During COVID-19 and Beyond: Tools and Considerations for Nursing Home Staff.
评估 COVID-19 期间及之后的社会功能:养老院工作人员的工具和注意事项。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Oct;22(10):1989-1997. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.07.022. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
4
Effects of age and cognitive function on data quality of standardized surveys in nursing home populations.年龄和认知功能对养老院人群标准化调查数据质量的影响。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Sep 3;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1258-0.
5
Important Care and Activity Preferences in a Nationally Representative Sample of Nursing Home Residents.全国代表性样本的养老院居民的重要护理和活动偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
6
"We can't provide season tickets to the opera": Staff perceptions of providing preference based person centered care.“我们无法提供歌剧季票”:工作人员对基于偏好提供以人为本护理的看法。
Clin Gerontol. 2016;39(3):190-209. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2016.1151968. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
7
"Make Me Feel at Ease and at Home": Differential Care Preferences of Nursing Home Residents.“让我感到安心自在”:养老院居民的差异化护理偏好
Gerontologist. 2016 Aug;56(4):702-13. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv026. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
8
Do Family Proxies Get It Right? Concordance in Reports of Nursing Home Residents' Everyday Preferences.家庭代理人的判断正确吗?养老院居民日常偏好报告的一致性
J Appl Gerontol. 2017 Jun;36(6):667-691. doi: 10.1177/0733464815581485. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
9
The consistency of self-reported preferences for everyday living: implications for person-centered care delivery.自我报告的日常生活偏好的一致性:对以患者为中心的护理服务的影响。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2014 Oct;40(10):34-46. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140820-01.
10
Temporal and Geographic variation in the validity and internal consistency of the Nursing Home Resident Assessment Minimum Data Set 2.0.养老院居民评估最低数据集中 2.0 的有效性和内部一致性的时间和地理变化。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr 15;11:78. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-78.