Korn Natalie, Kurhanewicz John, Banerjee Suchandrima, Starobinets Olga, Saritas Emine, Noworolski Susan
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; The Graduate Group in Bioengineering, University of California at San Francisco & Berkeley, CA, United States.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jan;33(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.040. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
The purposes of this study were to determine if image distortion is less in prostate MR apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps generated from a reduced-field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI) technique than from a conventional DWI sequence (CONV), and to determine if the rFOV ADC tumor contrast is as high as or better than that of the CONV sequence. Fifty patients underwent a 3T MRI exam. CONV and rFOV (utilizing a 2D, echo-planar, rectangularly-selective RF pulse) sequences were acquired using b=600, 0s/mm(2). Distortion was visually scored 0-4 by three independent observers and quantitatively measured using the difference in rectal wall curvature between the ADC maps and T2-weighted images. Distortion scores were lower with the rFOV sequence (p<0.012, Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, n=50), and difference in distortion scores did not differ significantly among observers (p=0.99, Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum Test). The difference in rectal curvature was less with rFOV ADC maps (26%±10%) than CONV ADC maps (34%±13%) (p<0.011, Student's t-test). In seventeen patients with untreated, biopsy confirmed prostate cancer, the rFOV sequence afforded significantly higher ADC tumor contrast (44.0%) than the CONV sequence (35.9%), (p<0.0012, Student's t-test). The rFOV sequence yielded significantly decreased susceptibility artifact and significantly higher contrast between tumor and healthy tissue.
本研究的目的是确定与传统扩散加权成像(DWI)序列(CONV)相比,采用缩小视野(rFOV)DWI技术生成的前列腺磁共振表观扩散系数(ADC)图中的图像失真是否更小,以及确定rFOV ADC肿瘤对比度是否与CONV序列一样高或更高。50例患者接受了3T磁共振成像检查。使用b=600、0s/mm(2)采集CONV和rFOV(利用二维、回波平面、矩形选择射频脉冲)序列。由三名独立观察者对失真进行0至4分的视觉评分,并使用ADC图与T2加权图像之间直肠壁曲率的差异进行定量测量。rFOV序列的失真评分更低(p<0.012,Wilcoxon符号秩检验,n=50),观察者之间的失真评分差异无显著统计学意义(p=0.99,Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验)。rFOV ADC图的直肠曲率差异(26%±10%)小于CONV ADC图(34%±13%)(p<0.011,Student t检验)。在17例未经治疗、活检确诊为前列腺癌的患者中,rFOV序列的ADC肿瘤对比度(44.0%)显著高于CONV序列(35.9%)(p<0.0012,Student t检验)。rFOV序列产生的磁化率伪影显著降低,肿瘤与健康组织之间的对比度显著提高。