Hoza Betsy, Smith Alan L, Shoulberg Erin K, Linnea Kate S, Dorsch Travis E, Blazo Jordan A, Alerding Caitlin M, McCabe George P
Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, 2 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA,
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 May;43(4):655-67. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9929-y.
The goal of this study was to compare the effects of before school physical activity (PA) and sedentary classroom-based (SC) interventions on the symptoms, behavior, moodiness, and peer functioning of young children (M age = 6.83) at risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD-risk; n = 94) and typically developing children (TD; n = 108). Children were randomly assigned to either PA or SC and participated in the assigned intervention 31 min per day, each school day, over the course of 12 weeks. Parent and teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms (inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity), oppositional behavior, moodiness, behavior toward peers, and reputation with peers, were used as dependent variables. Primary analyses indicate that the PA intervention was more effective than the SC intervention at reducing inattention and moodiness in the home context. Less conservative follow-up analyses within ADHD status and intervention groups suggest that a PA intervention may reduce impairment associated with ADHD-risk in both home and school domains; interpretive caution is warranted, however, given the liberal approach to these analyses. Unexpectedly, these findings also indicate the potential utility of a before school SC intervention as a tool for managing ADHD symptoms. Inclusion of a no treatment control group in future studies will enable further understanding of PA as an alternative management strategy for ADHD symptoms.
本研究的目的是比较学前体育活动(PA)干预和基于课堂久坐的(SC)干预对有注意力缺陷/多动障碍风险(ADHD风险;n = 94)的幼儿(平均年龄 = 6.83岁)以及发育正常的儿童(TD;n = 108)的症状、行为、情绪和同伴功能的影响。儿童被随机分配到PA组或SC组,在12周的时间里,每个上学日每天参与指定的干预31分钟。将父母和教师对ADHD症状(注意力不集中、多动/冲动)、对立行为、情绪、对同伴的行为以及在同伴中的声誉的评分作为因变量。初步分析表明,在减少家庭环境中的注意力不集中和情绪方面,PA干预比SC干预更有效。在ADHD状态和干预组内进行的不太保守的后续分析表明,PA干预可能会减少家庭和学校领域中与ADHD风险相关的损害;然而,鉴于这些分析方法较为宽松,需谨慎解读。出乎意料的是,这些发现还表明,学前SC干预作为一种管理ADHD症状的工具具有潜在效用。在未来的研究中纳入无治疗对照组将有助于进一步理解PA作为ADHD症状替代管理策略的作用。