Costa Filipa Alves, Guerreiro José Pedro, Duggan Catherine
Institute of Health Sciences Egas Moniz (ISCSEM). Centre for Pharmacoepidemologic Research (CEFAR), National Association of Pharmacies (ANF). Lisbon ( Portugal ).
Centre for Pharmacoepidemologic Research (CEFAR), National Association of Pharmacies (ANF). Lisbon ( Portugal ).
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2006;4(3):123-8.
This paper describes the processes involved to ensure a diabetes-specific quality of life questionnaire [the "Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life" (ADDQoL)] retained the psychometric properties following cross-cultural adaptation from English to Portuguese.
One hundred patients were recruited through community pharmacies located in Lisbon through a cross-sectional study design. Patients were asked to respond to the questionnaire on one occasion in time. Data were subjected to factor analysis, and internal consistency and discriminatory power analyses were undertaken.
In the Portuguese sample, 17 items loaded into one factor, with factor loadings above 0.43. The item "worries about the future" loaded weekly into this factor but if removed its internal consistency estimate increased very slightly (Cronbach's alpha=0.89 to 0.90). A greater negative impact of diabetes on 16 of the 18 quality of life domains was detected for insulin-treated patients, together with a greater negative impact on 14 of the 18 quality of life domains for patients with diabetic complications. The domain "freedom to eat" revealed the greatest negative impact in all patient subgroups, as described in its original version, so the psychometric properties were retained. Additionally, patients without diabetic complications reported a worse quality of life (greater negative impact) on the first overview item, present quality of life (Z=-2.25; p=0.024); whilst patients on insulin reported a greater negative impact of diabetes on their quality of life (Z=-1.94; p=0.053).
Generally, the Portuguese version for Portugal of the ADDQoL has shown to maintain its original psychometric properties, and could be recommended for use and further evaluation in subsequent studies.
本文描述了确保一份针对糖尿病患者的生活质量问卷[“糖尿病相关生活质量评估”(ADDQoL)]在从英语跨文化改编为葡萄牙语后仍保留其心理测量学特性所涉及的过程。
通过横断面研究设计,从里斯本的社区药房招募了100名患者。要求患者一次性回答问卷。对数据进行因子分析,并进行内部一致性和区分能力分析。
在葡萄牙样本中,17个项目加载到一个因子中,因子载荷高于0.43。“对未来的担忧”这一项目每周加载到该因子中,但如果去除,其内部一致性估计值略有增加(克朗巴哈系数从0.89提高到0.90)。对于接受胰岛素治疗的患者,糖尿病对18个生活质量领域中的16个产生了更大的负面影响,对于患有糖尿病并发症的患者,糖尿病对18个生活质量领域中的14个产生了更大的负面影响。如原始版本所述,“饮食自由”领域在所有患者亚组中显示出最大的负面影响,因此保留了其心理测量学特性。此外,没有糖尿病并发症的患者在所呈现生活质量的第一个总体项目上报告了更差的生活质量(更大的负面影响)(Z=-2.25;p=0.024);而使用胰岛素的患者报告糖尿病对其生活质量的负面影响更大(Z=-1.94;p=0.053)。
总体而言,ADDQoL的葡萄牙语葡萄牙版本已显示出保持其原始心理测量学特性,可推荐在后续研究中使用并进行进一步评估。