• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳米科学家作为公众传播者的分析。

An analysis of nanoscientists as public communicators.

机构信息

Moody College of Communication, Department of Advertising and Public Relations, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

出版信息

Nat Nanotechnol. 2014 Oct;9(10):841-4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.194. Epub 2014 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1038/nnano.2014.194
PMID:25218326
Abstract

The American public remains unfamiliar with nanotechnology despite more than a decade of investment and development. Nanoscientists have an opportunity to contribute to public conversations about their work, and its potential implications, through their engagement with lay audiences and media professionals. Indeed, the leaderships of many professional scientific organizations have placed a renewed focus on the public communication of science, particularly in the light of drastic changes in the information landscape and the increasing politicization of many technological and scientific issues. However, we have a limited understanding of nanoscientists' perceptions and behaviours regarding their participation in public communication. Here, we report survey results that provide an examination of the public communication behaviours of nanoscientists affiliated with the National Science Foundation's (NSF) National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN), an integrated partnership of US research institutions designed to facilitate nanoscale research and development. Our results suggest that nanoscientists are relatively frequent public communicators who commonly associate their communication efforts with positive impacts on their professional success. We also identify a handful of characteristics that drive nanoscientists' intentions to communicate with the public about nanotechnology.

摘要

尽管已经进行了十多年的投资和开发,但美国公众仍然对纳米技术不熟悉。纳米科学家有机会通过与普通受众和媒体专业人士的接触,为公众对他们的工作及其潜在影响的讨论做出贡献。事实上,许多专业科学组织的领导层已经重新关注科学的公众传播,尤其是考虑到信息格局的巨大变化,以及许多技术和科学问题的日益政治化。然而,我们对纳米科学家对参与公众传播的看法和行为的了解有限。在这里,我们报告了一项调查结果,该结果对隶属于美国国家科学基金会(NSF)国家纳米技术基础设施网络(NNIN)的纳米科学家的公众传播行为进行了考察,这是一个由美国研究机构组成的综合合作关系,旨在促进纳米级研究和开发。我们的研究结果表明,纳米科学家是相对频繁的公众传播者,他们通常将自己的传播努力与对其专业成功的积极影响联系起来。我们还确定了一些特征,这些特征推动了纳米科学家与公众就纳米技术进行交流的意愿。

相似文献

1
An analysis of nanoscientists as public communicators.纳米科学家作为公众传播者的分析。
Nat Nanotechnol. 2014 Oct;9(10):841-4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.194. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
2
Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology.风险与监管:美国顶尖纳米科学家如何形成关于纳米技术的政策立场。
J Nanopart Res. 2009 Oct;11(7):1573-1585. doi: 10.1007/s11051-009-9671-5. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
3
Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media.利用人际沟通策略鼓励社交媒体上的科学对话。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0241972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241972. eCollection 2020.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research.科学家在纳米技术研究中的伦理义务和社会责任。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Feb;22(1):111-32. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9637-1. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.
10
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists' attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public.感知行为控制的调节作用:科学家的态度、规范和公众参与意愿。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0275643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275643. eCollection 2022.
2
Public engagement by researchers of different disciplines in Singapore: A qualitative comparison of macro- and meso-level concerns.新加坡不同学科的研究人员的公众参与:宏观和中观层面关注点的定性比较。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Feb;29(2):211-229. doi: 10.1177/0963662519888761. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
3
Engagement present and future: Graduate student and faculty perceptions of social media and the role of the public in science engagement.

本文引用的文献

1
Gap between science and media revisited: scientists as public communicators.科学与媒体之间的差距再探讨:科学家作为公众传播者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14102-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212745110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
2
How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.科学家如何看待公众、媒体和政治进程。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Aug;22(6):644-59. doi: 10.1177/0963662511418743. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
3
Predicting scientists' participation in public life.预测科学家参与公共生活。
参与现状与未来:研究生和教师对社交媒体的看法,以及公众在科学参与中的作用。
PLoS One. 2019 May 2;14(5):e0216274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216274. eCollection 2019.
4
Microbiologists' Public Engagement Views and Behaviors.微生物学家的公众参与观点与行为。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2018 Mar 30;19(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1402. eCollection 2018.
5
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.
6
Public engagement: the benefits of communicating.公众参与:沟通的益处
Nat Nanotechnol. 2014 Oct;9(10):749. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.221.
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Nov;22(8):971-87. doi: 10.1177/0963662512459315. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
4
COMPASS: navigating the rules of scientific engagement.COMPASS:科学参与规则导航。
PLoS Biol. 2013;11(4):e1001552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001552. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
5
Labeling of nanotechnology consumer products can influence risk and benefit perceptions.纳米技术消费品的标签可以影响风险和收益的认知。
Risk Anal. 2011 Nov;31(11):1762-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01720.x.
6
Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology.风险与监管:美国顶尖纳米科学家如何形成关于纳米技术的政策立场。
J Nanopart Res. 2009 Oct;11(7):1573-1585. doi: 10.1007/s11051-009-9671-5. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
7
Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom.审议美国和英国纳米技术在能源与健康应用方面的风险。
Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Feb;4(2):95-8. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.362. Epub 2008 Dec 7.
8
Scientists worry about some risks more than the public.科学家比公众更担心一些风险。
Nat Nanotechnol. 2007 Dec;2(12):732-4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.392. Epub 2007 Nov 25.
9
Science communication. Interactions with the mass media.科学传播。与大众媒体的互动。
Science. 2008 Jul 11;321(5886):204-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1157780.
10
Outreach training needed.需要拓展培训。
Science. 2007 Jan 12;315(5809):161. doi: 10.1126/science.1138712.