ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia.
Waite Research Institute & School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, PMB1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Plant Methods. 2014 Sep 18;10:29. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-10-29. eCollection 2014.
An important step in characterising the function of a gene is identifying the cells in which it is expressed. Traditional methods to determine this include in situ hybridisation, gene promoter-reporter fusions or cell isolation/purification techniques followed by quantitative PCR. These methods, although frequently used, can have limitations including their time-consuming nature, limited specificity, reliance upon well-annotated promoters, high cost, and the need for specialized equipment. In situ PCR is a relatively simple and rapid method that involves the amplification of specific mRNA directly within plant tissue whilst incorporating labelled nucleotides that are subsequently detected by immunohistochemistry. Another notable advantage of this technique is that it can be used on plants that are not easily genetically transformed.
An optimised workflow for in-tube and on-slide in situ PCR is presented that has been evaluated using multiple plant species and tissue types. The protocol includes optimised methods for: (i) fixing, embedding, and sectioning of plant tissue; (ii) DNase treatment; (iii) in situ RT-PCR with the incorporation of DIG-labelled nucleotides; (iv) signal detection using colourimetric alkaline phosphatase substrates; and (v) mounting and microscopy. We also provide advice on troubleshooting and the limitations of using fluorescence as an alternative detection method. Using our protocol, reliable results can be obtained within two days from harvesting plant material. This method requires limited specialized equipment and can be adopted by any laboratory with a vibratome (vibrating blade microtome), a standard thermocycler, and a microscope. We show that the technique can be used to localise gene expression with cell-specific resolution.
The in situ PCR method presented here is highly sensitive and specific. It reliably identifies the cellular expression pattern of even highly homologous and low abundance transcripts within target tissues, and can be completed within two days of harvesting tissue. As such, it has considerable advantages over other methods, especially in terms of time and cost. We recommend its adoption as the standard laboratory technique of choice for demonstrating the cellular expression pattern of a gene of interest.
鉴定基因表达的细胞是描述基因功能的重要步骤。传统的方法包括原位杂交、基因启动子-报告基因融合或细胞分离/纯化技术,然后进行定量 PCR。这些方法虽然经常使用,但存在一些局限性,包括耗时、特异性有限、依赖于注释良好的启动子、成本高,以及需要专门的设备。原位 PCR 是一种相对简单和快速的方法,它涉及在植物组织中直接扩增特定的 mRNA,同时掺入标记的核苷酸,随后通过免疫组织化学进行检测。该技术的另一个显著优点是可以用于不易遗传转化的植物。
本文提出了一种优化的管内和载玻片上原位 PCR 工作流程,该流程已通过多种植物物种和组织类型进行了评估。该方案包括优化的方法:(i)植物组织的固定、包埋和切片;(ii)DNase 处理;(iii)原位 RT-PCR 与 DIG 标记核苷酸的掺入;(iv)使用比色碱性磷酸酶底物进行信号检测;(v)装片和显微镜检查。我们还提供了有关故障排除和使用荧光作为替代检测方法的局限性的建议。使用我们的方案,从收获植物材料到获得可靠结果,可在两天内完成。该方法需要有限的专用设备,任何拥有振动切片机(振动刀片切片机)、标准热循环仪和显微镜的实验室都可以采用该方法。我们表明,该技术可用于以细胞特异性分辨率定位基因表达。
本文提出的原位 PCR 方法具有高度的敏感性和特异性。它可靠地识别目标组织中高度同源和低丰度转录本的细胞表达模式,并且可以在收获组织后的两天内完成。因此,与其他方法相比,它具有很大的优势,尤其是在时间和成本方面。我们建议将其作为标准实验室技术,用于证明感兴趣基因的细胞表达模式。