Jones Neil P, Siegle Greg J, Mandell Darcy
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun;15(2):263-75. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0323-6.
Depressed people perform poorly on cognitive tasks; however, under certain conditions they show intact cognitive performance, with physiological reactivity consistent with needing to recruit additional cognitive control. We hypothesized that this apparent compensation is driven by the presence of affective processes (e.g., state anxiety), which in turn are moderated by the depressed individual's motivational state. Clarifying these processes may help researchers identify targets for treatment that if addressed may improve depressed patients' cognitive functioning. To test this hypothesis, 36 participants with unipolar depression and 36 never-depressed controls completed a problem-solving task that was modified to elicit anxiety. The participants completed measures of motivation, anxiety, sadness, and rumination, while pupillary responses were continuously measured during problem-solving, as an index of cognitive control. Anxiety increased throughout the task for all participants, whereas both sadness and rumination were decreased during the task. In addition, anxiety more strongly affected planning accuracy in depressed participants than in controls, regardless of the participants' levels of motivation. In contrast, differential effects of anxiety on pupillary responses were observed as a function of depressed participants' levels of motivation. Consistent with the behavioral results, less-motivated and anxious depressed participants demonstrated smaller pupillary responses, whereas more highly motivated and anxious depressed participants demonstrated larger pupillary responses than did controls. Strong effects of sadness and rumination on cognitive control in depression were not observed. Thus, we conclude that anxiety inhibits the recruitment of cognitive control in depression and that a depressed individual's motivational state determines, in part, whether he or she is able to compensate by recruiting additional cognitive control.
抑郁症患者在认知任务上表现不佳;然而,在某些情况下,他们表现出完整的认知能力,其生理反应与需要调动额外的认知控制相一致。我们假设这种明显的补偿是由情感过程(如状态焦虑)驱动的,而情感过程又受到抑郁症患者动机状态的调节。弄清楚这些过程可能有助于研究人员确定治疗靶点,若加以解决,可能会改善抑郁症患者的认知功能。为了验证这一假设,36名单相抑郁症患者和36名从未患过抑郁症的对照者完成了一项经过修改以引发焦虑的解决问题任务。参与者完成了动机、焦虑、悲伤和沉思的测量,同时在解决问题过程中持续测量瞳孔反应,作为认知控制的指标。所有参与者在整个任务过程中焦虑感都有所增加,而悲伤和沉思在任务过程中则有所减少。此外,无论参与者的动机水平如何,焦虑对抑郁症患者计划准确性的影响比对对照组的影响更强。相比之下,观察到焦虑对瞳孔反应的不同影响取决于抑郁症患者的动机水平。与行为结果一致,动机较低且焦虑的抑郁症患者瞳孔反应较小,而动机较高且焦虑的抑郁症患者瞳孔反应比对照组更大。未观察到悲伤和沉思对抑郁症认知控制有强烈影响。因此,我们得出结论,焦虑会抑制抑郁症患者认知控制的调动,且抑郁症患者的动机状态部分决定了他或她是否能够通过调动额外的认知控制来进行补偿。