Dewhirst Mark W, Viglianti Benjamin L, Lora-Michiels Michael, Hoopes P Jack, Hanson Margaret
Duke University Medical Center.
Dartmouth Medical School.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2003 Jun 2;4954:37. doi: 10.1117/12.476637.
In this review we have summarized the basic principles that govern the relationships between thermal exposure (Temperature and time of exposure) and thermal damage, with an emphasis on normal tissue effects. We have also attempted to identify specific thermal dose information (for safety and injury) for a variety of tissues in a variety of species. We address the use, accuracy and difficulty of conversion of an individual time and temperature (thermal doses) to a standardized value (eg equivalent minutes at 43 degrees C) for comparison of thermal treatments. Although, the conversion algorithm appears to work well within a range of moderately elevated temperatures (2-15 deg C) above normal physiologic baseline (37-39 deg C) there is concern that conversion accuracy does not hold up for temperatures which are minimally or significantly above baseline. An extensive review of the literature suggests a comprehensive assessment of the "thermal does-to-tissue effect" has not previously been assembled for most individual tissues and never been viewed in a semi-comprehensive (tissues and species) manner. Finally, we have addressed the relationship of thermal does-to-effect vs. baseline temperature. This issues is important since much of the thermal dose-to-effect information has been accrued in animal models with baseline temperatures 1-2 deg higher than that of humans.
在本综述中,我们总结了热暴露(温度和暴露时间)与热损伤之间关系的基本原则,重点关注正常组织效应。我们还试图确定各种物种中多种组织的特定热剂量信息(用于安全和损伤评估)。我们讨论了将个体时间和温度(热剂量)转换为标准化值(例如43摄氏度下的等效分钟数)以比较热治疗的用途、准确性和困难之处。尽管转换算法在高于正常生理基线(37 - 39摄氏度)的适度升高温度范围(2 - 15摄氏度)内似乎运行良好,但人们担心对于略高于或显著高于基线的温度,转换准确性无法保证。对文献的广泛综述表明,以前尚未针对大多数个体组织对“热剂量 - 组织效应”进行全面评估,也从未以半综合(组织和物种)的方式进行审视。最后,我们讨论了热剂量 - 效应与基线温度的关系。这个问题很重要,因为许多热剂量 - 效应信息是在基线温度比人类高1 - 2摄氏度的动物模型中积累的。