Department of Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2014 Sep;29(3):226-32. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2014.29.3.226.
Since the adoption of the Da Vinci robotic system for remote access thyroid surgery, robotic thyroidectomy (RT) has become a popular surgical option for patients who want to avoid neck scars. Surgeons in South Korea pioneered this surgical technique and have reported successful outcomes. Although many studies have reported that RT is a feasible and safe therapeutic alternative, concerns over the surgical and oncological safety of RT remain. This article reviews the advantages and disadvantages of RT and compares the surgical safety and oncological completeness of RT with conventional open thyroidectomy.
自从达芬奇机器人系统被用于远程甲状腺手术以来，机器人甲状腺切除术（RT）已成为希望避免颈部疤痕的患者的热门手术选择。韩国的外科医生开创了这种手术技术，并报告了成功的结果。尽管许多研究报告称 RT 是一种可行且安全的治疗选择，但人们对 RT 的手术和肿瘤安全性仍存在担忧。本文回顾了 RT 的优缺点，并比较了 RT 与传统开放甲状腺切除术的手术安全性和肿瘤完整性。
