Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉 CT 血管造影中的计算机辅助狭窄检测:对不同经验水平的读者性能的影响。

Computer-aided stenosis detection at coronary CT angiography: effect on performance of readers with different experience levels.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, MSC 226, Charleston, SC, 29401, USA.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):694-702. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3460-y. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm for coronary CT angiography (cCTA) on the performance of readers with different experience levels.

METHODS

We studied 50 patients (18 women, 58 ± 11 years) who had undergone cCTA and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Eight observers with varying experience levels evaluated all studies for ≥50 % coronary artery stenosis. After 3 months, the same observers re-evaluated all studies, this time guided by a CAD system. Their performance with and without the CAD system (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) was assessed using the Likelihood Ratio Χ(2) test both at the per-patient and per-vessel levels.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the CAD system alone for stenosis detection was 71 % per-vessel and 100 % per-patient. There were 54 false positive (FP) findings within 199 analyzed vessels, most of them associated with non-obstructive (<50 %) lesions. With CAD, one (out of three, 33 %) inexperienced reader's per-patient sensitivity and negative predictive value significantly improved from 79 % to 100 % (P = 0.046) and from 90 % to 100 % (P = 0.034), respectively. Other readers' performance indices showed no statistically significant change.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that CAD can improve some inexperienced readers' sensitivity for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis at cCTA.

摘要

目的

评估冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(cCTA)计算机辅助检测(CAD)算法对不同经验水平读者表现的影响。

方法

我们研究了 50 名患者(18 名女性,58±11 岁),他们接受了 cCTA 和定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)检查。8 名经验水平不同的观察者对所有研究进行了≥50%冠状动脉狭窄的评估。3 个月后,同一观察者在 CAD 系统的指导下重新评估了所有研究。使用似然比 Χ(2)检验在患者和血管水平上评估 CAD 系统指导前后观察者的表现(敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值)。

结果

CAD 系统单独用于检测狭窄的敏感度为每支血管 71%,每位患者 100%。在分析的 199 支血管中发现了 54 个假阳性(FP)发现,其中大多数与非阻塞性(<50%)病变有关。使用 CAD 后,一位(三位中的一位,33%)经验不足的读者的每位患者的敏感度和阴性预测值从 79%显著提高到 100%(P=0.046)和从 90%提高到 100%(P=0.034)。其他读者的表现指标没有统计学上的显著变化。

结论

我们的结果表明,CAD 可以提高一些经验不足的读者在 cCTA 诊断冠状动脉狭窄方面的敏感度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验