Suppr超能文献

接受治疗的施虐者亚型:对I型、II型和III型区分的实证支持

Subtypes of batterers in treatment: empirical support for a distinction between type I, type II and type III.

作者信息

Graña José Luis, Redondo Natalia, Muñoz-Rivas Marina J, Cantos Arthur L

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Faculty of Psychology, Autónoma University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 16;9(10):e110651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110651. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

This study explores the existence of different types of batterers in a sample of 266 men who had been court referred for intimate partner violence. The data collected in the assessment that have been used to perform a hierarchical and a two-step cluster analysis fall into three areas: aggression towards the partner, general aggression and presence of psychopathology and personality traits, more specifically, alcohol use, borderline and antisocial personality traits, psychopathy traits, state anger and trait anger, anger expression and control, anger, hostility, and, finally, impulsivity. The results show a typology consisting of 3 types of batterers on the basis of violence level and psychopathology: low (65%), moderate (27.8%) and high (7.1%). This study provides empirical support for the development of batterer typologies. These typologies will help achieve early detection of different types of batterers, allowing us to tailor interventions on the basis of the needs of each of the types.

摘要

本研究在266名因亲密伴侣暴力而被法庭转介的男性样本中,探究不同类型施暴者的存在情况。在评估中收集的数据已用于进行层次聚类分析和两步聚类分析,这些数据分为三个方面:对伴侣的攻击行为、一般攻击行为以及心理病理学和人格特质的存在情况,更具体地说,包括酒精使用、边缘型和反社会人格特质、精神病态特质、状态愤怒和特质愤怒、愤怒表达与控制、愤怒、敌意,以及最后一项冲动性。结果显示,根据暴力程度和心理病理学情况,存在一种由3种类型施暴者组成的类型划分:低暴力型(65%)、中度暴力型(27.8%)和高暴力型(7.1%)。本研究为施暴者类型划分的发展提供了实证支持。这些类型划分将有助于实现对不同类型施暴者的早期发现,使我们能够根据每种类型的需求量身定制干预措施。

相似文献

1
Subtypes of batterers in treatment: empirical support for a distinction between type I, type II and type III.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 16;9(10):e110651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110651. eCollection 2014.
2
4
Typologies of male batterers: three subtypes and the differences among them.
Psychol Bull. 1994 Nov;116(3):476-97. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.476.
5
Trait Anger, Physical Aggression, and Violent Offending in Antisocial and Borderline Personality Disorders.
J Forensic Sci. 2017 Jan;62(1):137-141. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13234. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
6
Male batterers with and without psychopathy: an exploratory study in Spanish prisons.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2007 Jun;51(3):254-63. doi: 10.1177/0306624X06291460.
7
Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation.
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Feb;35(3-4):1012-1034. doi: 10.1177/0886260517692994. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

2
Batterer typologies: substance use, impulsivity and results of an IPVAW offender treatment program in Spain.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 30;15:1492218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1492218. eCollection 2024.
3
IPVAW male perpetrators convicted in Spain: a typology and characterization based on latent class analysis.
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 4;15:1353809. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353809. eCollection 2024.
4
A Latent Profile Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrated by Men Seeking Help.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Oct;38(19-20):10542-10565. doi: 10.1177/08862605231174502. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
5
Personality characteristics in specialist and generalist intimate partner violence perpetrators.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023 Jan;30(1):86-96. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2778. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
6
Intimate Partner Aggression Committed by Prison Inmates with Psychopathic Profile.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 12;18(10):5141. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105141.
7
Treatment impact on recidivism of family only vs. generally violent partner violence perpetrators.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;19(3):171-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
Ideal and actual partner assessments in male batterers with different attachment styles.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 26;14(3):e0214388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214388. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

2
A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Feb;79(1):6-21. doi: 10.1037/a0022200.
3
Typological approaches to violence in couples: a critique and alternative conceptual approach.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Apr;27(3):253-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
4
Family violence.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:557-83. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190110.
5
The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review.
Br J Health Psychol. 2005 Sep;10(Pt 3):329-58. doi: 10.1348/135910705X25697.
6
The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: new directions for research, policy, and practice.
J Interpers Violence. 2005 Feb;20(2):155-66. doi: 10.1177/0886260504268763.
7
Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;23(8):1023-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001.
8
Do subtypes of maritally violent men continue to differ over time?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Aug;71(4):728-40. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.728.
9
A dyadic longitudinal model of adolescent dating aggression.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Sep;32(3):314-27. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3203_01.
10
Categorizing partner-violent men within the reactive-proactive typology model.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Jun;69(3):567-72. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.69.3.567.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验