Suppr超能文献

活体亲属肝移植中移植物大小估计的准确性:CT容积测量半自动交互式软件的初步结果

Accuracy of estimation of graft size for living-related liver transplantation: first results of a semi-automated interactive software for CT-volumetry.

作者信息

Mokry Theresa, Bellemann Nadine, Müller Dirk, Lorenzo Bermejo Justo, Klauß Miriam, Stampfl Ulrike, Radeleff Boris, Schemmer Peter, Kauczor Hans-Ulrich, Sommer Christof-Matthias

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Philips Healthcare Germany, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 17;9(10):e110201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110201. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate accuracy of estimated graft size for living-related liver transplantation using a semi-automated interactive software for CT-volumetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen donors for living-related liver transplantation (11 male; mean age: 38.2±9.6 years) underwent contrast-enhanced CT prior to graft removal. CT-volumetry was performed using a semi-automated interactive software (P), and compared with a manual commercial software (TR). For P, liver volumes were provided either with or without vessels. For TR, liver volumes were provided always with vessels. Intraoperative weight served as reference standard. Major study goals included analyses of volumes using absolute numbers, linear regression analyses and inter-observer agreements. Minor study goals included the description of the software workflow: degree of manual correction, speed for completion, and overall intuitiveness using five-point Likert scales: 1--markedly lower/faster/higher for P compared with TR, 2--slightly lower/faster/higher for P compared with TR, 3--identical for P and TR, 4--slightly lower/faster/higher for TR compared with P, and 5--markedly lower/faster/higher for TR compared with P.

RESULTS

Liver segments II/III, II-IV and V-VIII served in 6, 3, and 7 donors as transplanted liver segments. Volumes were 642.9±368.8 ml for TR with vessels, 623.8±349.1 ml for P with vessels, and 605.2±345.8 ml for P without vessels (P<0.01). Regression equations between intraoperative weights and volumes were y = 0.94x+30.1 (R2 = 0.92; P<0.001) for TR with vessels, y = 1.00x+12.0 (R2 = 0.92; P<0.001) for P with vessels, and y = 1.01x+28.0 (R2 = 0.92; P<0.001) for P without vessels. Inter-observer agreement showed a bias of 1.8 ml for TR with vessels, 5.4 ml for P with vessels, and 4.6 ml for P without vessels. For the degree of manual correction, speed for completion and overall intuitiveness, scale values were 2.6±0.8, 2.4±0.5 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-volumetry performed with P can predict accurately graft size for living-related liver transplantation while improving workflow compared with TR.

摘要

目的

使用半自动交互式软件进行CT容积测量,评估活体肝移植中预估移植物大小的准确性。

材料与方法

16例活体肝移植供体(11例男性;平均年龄:38.2±9.6岁)在移除移植物前接受了增强CT检查。使用半自动交互式软件(P)进行CT容积测量,并与手动商业软件(TR)进行比较。对于P软件,肝容积测量时包含或不包含血管。对于TR软件,肝容积测量时始终包含血管。术中重量作为参考标准。主要研究目标包括使用绝对数值分析容积、线性回归分析以及观察者间一致性分析。次要研究目标包括描述软件工作流程:手动校正程度、完成速度以及使用五点李克特量表评估整体直观性:1——与TR相比,P明显更低/更快/更高;2——与TR相比,P略低/更快/更高;3——P和TR相同;4——与P相比,TR略低/更快/更高;5——与P相比,TR明显更低/更快/更高。

结果

6例、3例和7例供体的肝段II/III、II-IV和V-VIII用作移植肝段。TR测量包含血管时的肝容积为642.9±368.8 ml,P测量包含血管时为623.8±349.1 ml,P测量不包含血管时为605.2±345.8 ml(P<0.01)。TR测量包含血管时术中重量与容积的回归方程为y = 0.94x + 30.1(R2 = 0.92;P<0.001),P测量包含血管时为y = 1.00x + 12.0(R2 = 0.92;P<0.001),P测量不包含血管时为y = 1.01x + 28.0(R2 = 0.92;P<0.001)。观察者间一致性显示,TR测量包含血管时偏差为1.8 ml,P测量包含血管时为5.4 ml,P测量不包含血管时为4.6 ml。对于手动校正程度、完成速度和整体直观性,量表值分别为2.6±0.8、2.4±0.5和2。

结论

与TR相比,使用P软件进行CT容积测量能够准确预测活体肝移植的移植物大小,同时改善工作流程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec8c/4201494/3ef70f6d7710/pone.0110201.g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Liver Graft Volume Estimation by Manual Volumetry and Software-Aided Interactive Volumetry: Which is Better?
Transplant Proc. 2019 Sep;51(7):2387-2390. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.152. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
4
Dr. Liver: A preoperative planning system of liver graft volumetry for living donor liver transplantation.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 May;158:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.024. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
Comparison Between Pre-operative Radiologic Findings and the Actual Operative Findings of the Graft in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation.
Transplant Proc. 2020 Apr;52(3):894-899. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.12.042. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
Feasibility of three-dimensional virtual surgical planning in living liver donors.
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Mar;40(3):510-20. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0231-9.
8
3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation.
Eur Radiol. 2004 Feb;14(2):326-33. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2161-8. Epub 2003 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between CT volumetry and actual graft weight in living donor liver transplants in South Africa.
SA J Radiol. 2024 Sep 5;28(1):2917. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2917. eCollection 2024.
8
Hepatic volume profiles in potential living liver donors with anomalous right-sided ligamentum teres.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Apr;46(4):1562-1571. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02803-0. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
10
Automatic atlas-based liver segmental anatomy identification for hepatic surgical planning.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Feb;15(2):239-248. doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-02078-x. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

2
Living vs. deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clin Transplant. 2013 Jan-Feb;27(1):140-7. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12031. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
4
Accurate estimation of living donor right hemi-liver volume from portal vein diameter measurement and standard liver volume calculation.
Am J Transplant. 2012 May;12(5):1229-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03909.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
7
Discrepancy between estimated and actual weight of partial liver graft from living donors.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011 Jul;18(4):586-91. doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0374-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验