Suppr超能文献

评估两个国家环境干预措施的影响:国际共享单车对骑行与碰撞影响研究(IBICCS)研究方案

Evaluating the impact of environmental interventions across 2 countries: the International Bikeshare Impacts on Cycling and Collisions Study (IBICCS) Study protocol.

作者信息

Fuller Daniel, Gauvin Lise, Dubé Anne-Sophie, Winters Meghan, Teschke Kay, Russo Elizabeth T, Camden Andi, Mee Carol, Friedman Steven Marc

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 25;14:1103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1103.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few international studies examine public bicycle share programs (PBSP) health impacts. We describe the protocol for the International Bikeshare Impacts on Cycling and Collisions Study (IBICCS).

METHODS

A quasi-experimental non-equivalent groups design was used. Intervention cities (Montreal, Toronto, Boston, New York and Vancouver) were matched to control cities (Chicago, Detroit, and Philadelphia) on total population, population density, cycling rates, and average yearly temperature. The study used three repeated, cross-sectional surveys in intervention and control cities in Fall 2012 (baseline), 2013 (year 1), and 2014 (year 2). A non-probabilistic online panel survey with a sampling frame of individuals residing in and around areas where PBSP are/would be implemented was used. A total of 12,000 respondents will be sampled. In each of the 8 cities 1000 respondents will be sampled with an additional 4000 respondents sampled based on the total population of the city. Survey questions include measures of self-rated health, and self-reported height and weight, knowledge and experience using PBSP, physical activity, bicycle helmet use and history of collisions and injuries while cycling, socio-demographic questions, and home/workplace locations. Respondents could complete questionnaires in English, French, and Spanish. Two weights will be applied to the data: inverse probability of selection and post-stratification on age and sex.A triple difference analysis will be used. This approach includes in the models, time, exposure, and treatment group, and interaction terms between these variables to estimate changes across time, between exposure groups and between cities.

DISCUSSION

There are scientific and practical challenges in evaluating PBSP. Methodological challenges included: appropriate sample recruitment, exchangeability of treatment and control groups, controlling unmeasured confounding, and specifying exposure. Practical challenges arise in the evaluation of environmental interventions such as a PBSP: one of the companies involved filed for bankruptcy, a Hurricane devastated New York City, and one PBSP was not implemented. Overall, this protocol provides methodological and practical guidance for researchers wanting to study PBSP impacts on health.

摘要

背景

很少有国际研究探讨公共自行车共享计划(PBSP)对健康的影响。我们描述了国际自行车共享对骑行和碰撞影响研究(IBICCS)的方案。

方法

采用了准实验性非等效组设计。干预城市(蒙特利尔、多伦多、波士顿、纽约和温哥华)在总人口、人口密度、骑行率和年平均气温方面与对照城市(芝加哥、底特律和费城)进行匹配。该研究在2012年秋季(基线)、2013年(第1年)和2014年(第2年)对干预城市和对照城市进行了三次重复的横断面调查。使用了一个非概率在线面板调查,抽样框架为居住在PBSP已实施或即将实施地区及其周边的个人。总共将抽取12000名受访者。在8个城市中的每个城市抽取1000名受访者,并根据城市总人口额外抽取4000名受访者。调查问题包括自我评估健康状况的指标、自我报告的身高和体重、使用PBSP的知识和经验、身体活动、骑自行车时使用头盔的情况以及骑行时碰撞和受伤的历史、社会人口统计学问题以及家庭/工作场所位置。受访者可以用英语、法语和西班牙语完成问卷。将对数据应用两种权重:选择的逆概率以及按年龄和性别进行后分层。将使用三重差分分析。这种方法在模型中纳入时间、暴露和治疗组,以及这些变量之间的交互项,以估计不同时间、暴露组之间和城市之间的变化。

讨论

在评估PBSP时存在科学和实际挑战。方法学挑战包括:适当的样本招募、治疗组和对照组的可交换性、控制未测量的混杂因素以及确定暴露。在评估诸如PBSP这样的环境干预措施时会出现实际挑战:其中一家参与的公司申请了破产,一场飓风摧毁了纽约市,并且一项PBSP未实施。总体而言,该方案为希望研究PBSP对健康影响的研究人员提供了方法学和实践指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42a4/4232659/73281ec72fb4/12889_2014_7221_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验