利用环境影响评估保护健康：以旧金山土地利用决策为例的研究
Protecting health using an environmental impact assessment: a case study of San Francisco land use decisionmaking.
作者信息
Bhatia Rajiv
机构信息
San Francisco Department of Public Health and the University of California, San Francisco, USA.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2007 Mar;97(3):406-13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.073817. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
Abstract
Laws and regulations for an environmental impact assessment enable a health impact assessment whenever physical changes in the environment may significantly affect health. In this case study, I describe 2 instances in which a local public health agency used the procedural requirements for an environmental impact assessment to account for societal-level health determinants that are not traditionally evaluated in land-use decisions. These examples show that a public health critique can contribute both to the scope of analysis in an environmental impact assessment and to substantive changes in land-use decisions. I have evaluated this health appraisal approach as a form of a health impact assessment and will make recommendations for law, research, and practice that support its technical, cultural, and political feasibility.
摘要
环境影响评估的法律法规允许在环境中的物理变化可能对健康产生重大影响时进行健康影响评估。在本案例研究中，我描述了两个实例，其中当地公共卫生机构利用环境影响评估的程序要求，来考虑那些在土地使用决策中传统上未被评估的社会层面的健康决定因素。这些例子表明，公共卫生批评既可以有助于扩大环境影响评估的分析范围，也可以促成土地使用决策的实质性改变。我已将这种健康评估方法评估为健康影响评估的一种形式，并将为法律、研究和实践提出建议，以支持其技术、文化和政治上的可行性。
相似文献
1
Protecting health using an environmental impact assessment: a case study of San Francisco land use decisionmaking.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Mar;97(3):406-13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.073817. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
2
Creating tools for healthy development: case study of San Francisco's Eastern Neighborhoods Community Health Impact Assessment.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):255-65. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000316484.72759.7b.
3
Lessons from San Francisco: health impact assessments have advanced political conditions for improving population health.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec;30(12):2410-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1303.
4
The Promise of Wisconsin's 1999 Comprehensive Planning Law: Land-Use Policy Reforms to Support Active Living.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008 Jun;33(3):455-96. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2008-005.
5
Urban form, health, and the law's limits.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1395-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1395.
6
The public health roots of zoning: in search of active living's legal genealogy.
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.028.
7
Health impact assessments are needed in decision making about environmental and land-use policy.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 May;30(5):947-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0050.
8
Use of science to guide city planning policy and practice: how to achieve healthy and sustainable future cities.
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2936-2947. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30068-X. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
9
Urban health: an urban planning perspective.
Rev Environ Health. 2000 Jan-Jun;15(1-2):249-65. doi: 10.1515/reveh.2000.15.1-2.249.
10
Soft data, hard effects. Strategies for effective policy on health impact assessment--an example from the Netherlands.
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(6):404-7. Epub 2003 Jul 25.
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluating Racial/Ethnic Equity in Planning-Related U.S. Health Impact Assessments Involving Parks and Greenspaces: A Review.
J Am Plann Assoc. 2023;89(4):472-486. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2022.2096100. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
Curriculum development in health and the built environment: creating a multidisciplinary platform to enhance knowledge and engagement.
ArchNet-IJAR. 2020 Nov 11;14(3):439-452. doi: 10.1108/arch-09-2019-0212. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
3
Climate Change, Environmental Disasters, and Health Inequities: The Underlying Role of Structural Inequalities.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2022 Mar;9(1):80-89. doi: 10.1007/s40572-022-00336-w. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
4
Space, race, and poverty: Spatial inequalities in walkable neighborhood amenities?
Demogr Res. 2012 Jan-Jun;26(17):409-448. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.17. Epub 2012 May 15.
5
Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessments: A Synthesis of Data From Five Impact Evaluation Reports.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 30;13:E84. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150559.
6
The geography of recreational open space: influence of neighborhood racial composition and neighborhood poverty.
J Urban Health. 2013 Aug;90(4):618-31. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9770-y.
7
Health impact assessment: necessary but not sufficient for healthy public policy.
Public Health Rep. 2012 Mar-Apr;127(2):156-62. doi: 10.1177/003335491212700204.
8
City governments and aging in place: community design, transportation and housing innovation adoption.
Gerontologist. 2012 Jun;52(3):345-56. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr089. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
9
Health, traffic, and environmental justice: collaborative research and community action in San Francisco, California.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S499-504. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.148916.
10
Integrating human health into environmental impact assessment: an unrealized opportunity for environmental health and justice.
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Aug;116(8):991-1000. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11132.
本文引用的文献
1
Growing the field of health impact assessment in the United States: an agenda for research and practice.
Am J Public Health. 2006 Feb;96(2):262-70. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069880. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
2
Criteria for use in the evaluation of health impact assessments.
Public Health. 2005 Dec;119(12):1122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.05.002.
3
Prospects for health impact assessment in the United States: new and improved environmental impact assessment or something different?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2004 Dec;29(6):1153-86. doi: 10.1215/03616878-29-6-1153.
4
Evaluation of the health effects of a neighbourhood traffic calming scheme.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Oct;58(10):837-40. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.017509.
5
Confronting the challenges in reconnecting urban planning and public health.
Am J Public Health. 2004 Apr;94(4):541-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.541.
6
Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1546-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1546.
7
The impact of community design and land-use choices on public health: a scientific research agenda.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1500-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1500.
8
Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1478-83. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1478.
9
Integrated environmental impact assessment: a Canadian example.
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(6):434-8. Epub 2003 Jul 25.
10
Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health.
Public Health Rep. 2001 Sep-Oct;116(5):404-16. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.5.404.
Zotero 插件