Mathiassen Svend Erik, Hallman David M, Lyskov Eugene, Hygge Staffan
Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.
Department of Building, Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 6;9(11):e112090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112090. eCollection 2014.
Neurophysiologic theory and some empirical evidence suggest that fatigue caused by physical work may be more effectively recovered during "diverting" periods of cognitive activity than during passive rest; a phenomenon of great interest in working life. We investigated the extent to which development and recovery of fatigue during repeated bouts of an occupationally relevant reaching task was influenced by the difficulty of a cognitive activity between these bouts. Eighteen male volunteers performed three experimental sessions, consisting of six 7-min bouts of reaching alternating with 3 minutes of a memory test differing in difficulty between sessions. Throughout each session, recordings were made of upper trapezius muscle activity using electromyography (EMG), heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) using electrocardiography, arterial blood pressure, and perceived fatigue (Borg CR10 scale and SOFI). A test battery before, immediately after and 1 hour after the work period included measurements of maximal shoulder elevation strength (MVC), pressure pain threshold (PPT) over the trapezius muscles, and a submaximal isometric contraction. As expected, perceived fatigue and EMG amplitude increased during the physical work bouts. Recovery did occur between the bouts, but fatigue accumulated throughout the work period. Neither EMG changes nor recovery of perceived fatigue during breaks were influenced by cognitive task difficulty, while heart rate and HRV recovered the most during breaks with the most difficult task. Recovery of perceived fatigue after the 1 hour work period was also most pronounced for the most difficult cognitive condition, while MVC and PPT showed ambiguous patterns, and EMG recovered similarly after all three cognitive protocols. Thus, we could confirm that cognitive tasks between bouts of fatiguing physical work can, indeed, accelerate recovery of some factors associated with fatigue, even if benefits may be moderate and some responses may be equivocal. Our results encourage further research into combinations of physical and mental tasks in an occupational context.
神经生理学理论和一些实证证据表明,与被动休息相比,在认知活动的“转移”阶段,体力劳动引起的疲劳可能会更有效地恢复;这是工作生活中一个非常有趣的现象。我们研究了在重复进行与职业相关的伸手任务期间,疲劳的发展和恢复在多大程度上受到这些任务之间认知活动难度的影响。18名男性志愿者进行了三个实验环节,每个环节包括六次7分钟的伸手任务,中间穿插3分钟的记忆测试,各环节的记忆测试难度不同。在每个环节中,使用肌电图(EMG)记录上斜方肌的肌肉活动,使用心电图记录心率和心率变异性(HRV)、动脉血压,并记录主观疲劳感(Borg CR10量表和SOFI)。在工作时段之前、之后立即以及之后1小时进行的一组测试包括测量最大肩部抬高力量(MVC)、斜方肌上的压痛阈值(PPT)以及一次次最大等长收缩。正如预期的那样,在体力工作时段,主观疲劳感和EMG幅度增加。各时段之间确实出现了恢复,但在整个工作期间疲劳仍在累积。休息期间EMG的变化和主观疲劳感的恢复均不受认知任务难度的影响,而在难度最大的任务后的休息期间,心率和HRV恢复得最为明显。在1小时工作时段后,对于难度最大的认知条件,主观疲劳感的恢复也最为显著,而MVC和PPT呈现出不明确的模式,并且在所有三种认知方案后EMG的恢复情况相似。因此,我们可以确认,在疲劳的体力工作时段之间进行认知任务确实可以加速与疲劳相关的一些因素的恢复,即使益处可能有限且一些反应可能不明确。我们的研究结果鼓励在职业环境中对体力和脑力任务的组合进行进一步研究。