Nickerson Terry P, Kim Brian D, Zielinski Martin D, Jenkins Donald, Schiller Henry J
Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
World J Surg. 2015 Mar;39(3):789-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2862-y.
Rib fracture stabilization has become a more accepted practice although stabilization of the most cephalad ribs presents a unique challenge. We present our experience with use of a 90° drill and screwdriver to bridge these difficult rib fractures.
This retrospective review included patients who underwent rib fracture stabilization from August 1, 2009, through September 30, 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: those whose procedure used the 90° device and those that did not. Data were compared using standard statistical analysis and reported as percentages and medians [interquartile ranges]. P values <0.05 were considered significant.
We identified 89 patients: 29 (33%) had 90° devices used and 60 (67%) did not. There were no differences between groups in age, sex, Trauma-Related Injury Severity Score, the presence of flail chest, occurrence of pneumonia, and intensive care unit or hospital length of stay. The Injury Severity Score was higher in the 90° group (22 vs. 16; P = 0.03). The highest rib stabilized was different between the 2 groups (3 [2-5] vs. 5 [2-9]; P = 0.001), with more third rib stabilizations in the 90° group (38 vs. 20%; P = 0.04) as well as more total number of ribs fixed (5 vs. 4; P = 0.001). There was no difference in operative time between the 2 groups.
The surgical reach for rib fracture stabilization has been extended with use of a 90° drill and screwdriver. High fractures under the scapula where access is technically challenging can be stabilized without prolonging operative times.
肋骨骨折固定术已成为一种更被广泛接受的治疗方法,尽管最上端肋骨的固定面临独特挑战。我们介绍使用90°钻头和螺丝刀固定这些困难肋骨骨折的经验。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2009年8月1日至2012年9月30日期间接受肋骨骨折固定术的患者。患者分为两组:使用90°器械的患者和未使用的患者。采用标准统计分析比较数据,并以百分比和中位数[四分位间距]报告。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
我们确定了89例患者:29例(33%)使用了90°器械,60例(67%)未使用。两组在年龄、性别、创伤相关损伤严重程度评分、连枷胸的存在、肺炎的发生率以及重症监护病房或住院时间方面没有差异。90°组的损伤严重程度评分更高(22比16;P = 0.03)。两组中固定的最高肋骨不同(3[2 - 5]比5[2 - 9];P = 0.001),90°组第三肋骨固定更多(38%比20%;P = 0.04),固定的肋骨总数也更多(5根比4根;P = 0.001)。两组手术时间没有差异。
使用90°钻头和螺丝刀扩展了肋骨骨折固定术的手术范围。肩胛骨下方技术上难以触及的高位骨折可以得到固定,且不延长手术时间。