Lubell Yoel, Dondorp Arjen, Guérin Philippe J, Drake Tom, Meek Sylvia, Ashley Elizabeth, Day Nicholas P J, White Nicholas J, White Lisa J
Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Malar J. 2014 Nov 23;13:452. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-452.
Artemisinin combination therapy is recommended as first-line treatment for falciparum malaria across the endemic world and is increasingly relied upon for treating vivax malaria where chloroquine is failing. Artemisinin resistance was first detected in western Cambodia in 2007, and is now confirmed in the Greater Mekong region, raising the spectre of a malaria resurgence that could undo a decade of progress in control, and threaten the feasibility of elimination. The magnitude of this threat has not been quantified.
This analysis compares the health and economic consequences of two future scenarios occurring once artemisinin-based treatments are available with high coverage. In the first scenario, artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) is largely effective in the management of uncomplicated malaria and severe malaria is treated with artesunate, while in the second scenario ACT are failing at a rate of 30%, and treatment of severe malaria reverts to quinine. The model is applied to all malaria-endemic countries using their specific estimates for malaria incidence, transmission intensity and GDP. The model describes the direct medical costs for repeated diagnosis and retreatment of clinical failures as well as admission costs for severe malaria. For productivity losses, the conservative friction costing method is used, which assumes a limited economic impact for individuals that are no longer economically active until they are replaced from the unemployment pool.
Using conservative assumptions and parameter estimates, the model projects an excess of 116,000 deaths annually in the scenario of widespread artemisinin resistance. The predicted medical costs for retreatment of clinical failures and for management of severe malaria exceed US$32 million per year. Productivity losses resulting from excess morbidity and mortality were estimated at US$385 million for each year during which failing ACT remained in use as first-line treatment.
These 'ballpark' figures for the magnitude of the health and economic threat posed by artemisinin resistance add weight to the call for urgent action to detect the emergence of resistance as early as possible and contain its spread from known locations in the Mekong region to elsewhere in the endemic world.
青蒿素联合疗法被推荐为全球疟疾流行地区恶性疟的一线治疗方法,并且在氯喹治疗失败的间日疟治疗中越来越多地被依赖。青蒿素耐药性于2007年首次在柬埔寨西部被发现,目前在大湄公河地区已得到确认,这引发了疟疾卷土重来的担忧,这可能会使十年的疟疾防控成果付诸东流,并威胁到疟疾消除的可行性。这种威胁的严重程度尚未得到量化。
本分析比较了两种未来情景下的健康和经济后果,这两种情景发生在基于青蒿素的治疗方法得到高覆盖率应用之后。在第一种情景中,青蒿素联合疗法(ACT)在非复杂性疟疾的管理中基本有效,严重疟疾用青蒿琥酯治疗;而在第二种情景中,ACT的失败率为30%,严重疟疾的治疗恢复使用奎宁。该模型应用于所有疟疾流行国家,使用它们对疟疾发病率、传播强度和国内生产总值的具体估计值。该模型描述了临床治疗失败后重复诊断和再治疗的直接医疗费用以及严重疟疾的住院费用。对于生产力损失,使用保守的摩擦成本计算方法,该方法假定对于那些直到从失业人群中被替代之前不再从事经济活动的个人,其经济影响有限。
使用保守的假设和参数估计,该模型预测在青蒿素广泛耐药的情景下,每年将有超过11.6万人死亡。临床治疗失败再治疗和严重疟疾管理的预计医疗费用每年超过3200万美元。在ACT作为一线治疗失败仍在使用的每一年中,因发病率和死亡率过高导致的生产力损失估计为3.85亿美元。
这些关于青蒿素耐药性造成的健康和经济威胁严重程度的“大致”数字,进一步支持了呼吁采取紧急行动的声音,即尽早发现耐药性的出现,并控制其从湄公河地区的已知地点传播到疟疾流行世界的其他地方。