• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生从家中带来的午餐的质量和成本。

Quality and cost of student lunches brought from home.

机构信息

Houston Department of Health and Human Services, Houston, Texas.

Department of Pediatrics, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jan;169(1):86-90. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2220.

DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2220
PMID:25419622
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The nutritional quality and cost of lunches brought from home are overlooked and understudied aspects of the school food environment.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the quality and cost of lunches brought from home by elementary and intermediate school students.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational study was conducted in 12 schools (8 elementary and 4 intermediate) in one Houston, Texas, area school district from October 6, 2011, to December 5, 2011. Participants included 242 elementary and 95 intermediate school students who brought lunches from home.

EXPOSURES

Lunches brought from home.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Foods brought and amounts eaten were recorded along with student grade level and sex. Nutrient and food group content were calculated and compared with current National School Lunch Program (NSLP) guidelines. Per-serving prices for each item were collected from 3 grocery stores in the study area and averaged.

RESULTS

Compared with the NSLP guidelines, lunches brought from home contained more sodium (1110 vs ≤640 mg for elementary and 1003 vs ≤710 mg for intermediate students) and fewer servings of fruits (0.33 cup for elementary and 0.29 cup for intermediate students vs 0.50 cup per the NSLP guidelines), vegetables (0.07 cup for elementary and 0.11 cup for intermediate students vs 0.75 cup per the NSLP guidelines), whole grains (0.22-oz equivalent for elementary and 0.31-oz equivalent for intermediate students vs 0.50-oz minimum per the NLSP guidelines), and fluid milk (0.08 cup for elementary and 0.02 cup for intermediate students vs 1 cup per the NSLP guidelines). About 90% of lunches from home contained desserts, snack chips, and sweetened beverages, which are not permitted in reimbursable school meals. The cost of lunches from home averaged $1.93 for elementary and $1.76 for intermediate students. Students from lower-income intermediate schools brought significantly higher-priced ($1.94) lunches than did students from middle-income schools ($1.63).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Lunches brought from home compared unfavorably with current NSLP guidelines. Strategies are needed to improve the nutritional quality of lunches brought from home.

摘要

重要性

从家中带来的午餐的营养质量和成本是学校饮食环境中被忽视和研究不足的方面。

目的

检查小学生和中学生从家中带来的午餐的质量和成本。

设计、地点和参与者:在德克萨斯州休斯顿地区的一个学区的 12 所学校(8 所小学和 4 所中学)进行了一项观察性研究,从 2011 年 10 月 6 日至 12 月 5 日。参与者包括 242 名小学生和 95 名中学生,他们从家中带来了午餐。

暴露

从家中带来的午餐。

主要结果和测量

记录了学生带来的食物种类和摄入量,以及学生的年级和性别。计算了营养素和食物组的含量,并与当前的国家学校午餐计划(NSLP)准则进行了比较。从研究区域的 3 家杂货店收集了每种物品的单价,并取平均值。

结果

与 NSLP 准则相比,从家中带来的午餐钠含量更高(小学生 1110 毫克,中学生 1003 毫克,而小学生 640 毫克,中学生 710 毫克),水果摄入量较少(小学生 0.33 杯,中学生 0.29 杯,而 NSLP 准则要求 0.50 杯),蔬菜(小学生 0.07 杯,中学生 0.11 杯,而 NSLP 准则要求 0.75 杯),全谷物(小学生 0.22 盎司当量,中学生 0.31 盎司当量,而 NSLP 准则要求 0.50 盎司最低量),以及液体牛奶(小学生 0.08 杯,中学生 0.02 杯,而 NSLP 准则要求 1 杯)。大约 90%的从家中带来的午餐含有甜点、零食薯片和甜饮料,这些在可报销的学校餐中是不允许的。从家中带来的午餐的平均费用为小学生 1.93 美元,中学生 1.76 美元。来自低收入中学的学生带来的午餐价格明显更高(1.94 美元),而来自中等收入学校的学生则较低(1.63 美元)。

结论和相关性

从家中带来的午餐与当前的 NSLP 准则相比表现不佳。需要采取策略来提高从家中带来的午餐的营养质量。

相似文献

1
Quality and cost of student lunches brought from home.学生从家中带来的午餐的质量和成本。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jan;169(1):86-90. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2220.
2
Gender Differences in Nutritional Quality and Consumption of Lunches Brought from Home to School.家庭带往学校午餐的营养质量和消费的性别差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;18(24):13168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413168.
3
School lunches and lunches brought from home: a comparative analysis.学校午餐和自带午餐:比较分析。
Child Obes. 2012 Aug;8(4):364-8. doi: 10.1089/chi.2012.0012.
4
The Quality of Lunches Brought from Home to School: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.从家中带到学校的午餐质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Nutr. 2024 Aug;15(8):100255. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100255. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
5
Younger Elementary School Students Waste More School Lunch Foods than Older Elementary School Students.低年级小学生比高年级小学生浪费更多的学校午餐食物。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Jan;117(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.08.005.
6
Consumption of low-nutrient, energy-dense foods and beverages at school, home, and other locations among school lunch participants and nonparticipants.学校午餐参与者和非参与者在学校、家中及其他场所食用低营养、高能量食品和饮料的情况。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Feb;109(2 Suppl):S79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.064.
7
Middle-school students' school lunch consumption does not meet the new Institute of Medicine's National School Lunch Program recommendations.中学生的学校午餐消费不符合新的美国医学研究所国家学校午餐计划的建议。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Oct;14(10):1876-81. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011000656. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
8
A comparison of fruits, vegetables, sugar-sweetened beverages, and desserts in the packed lunches of elementary school children.小学儿童盒饭中水果、蔬菜、含糖饮料和甜点的比较。
Child Obes. 2015 Jun;11(3):275-80. doi: 10.1089/chi.2014.0134. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
9
Participation in the national school lunch program: importance of school-level and neighborhood contextual factors.参与国家学校午餐计划:学校层面和社区背景因素的重要性。
J Sch Health. 2009 Oct;79(10):485-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00438.x.
10
Adolescent Participants in the School Lunch Program Consume More Nutritious Lunches but Their 24-hour Diets Are Similar to Nonparticipants.学校午餐计划中的青少年参与者食用更营养的午餐,但他们的 24 小时饮食与非参与者相似。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Aug;69(2):308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.12.003. Epub 2021 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpacking the cost of the lunchbox for Australian families: a secondary analysis.澳大利亚家庭午餐盒成本解析:二次分析。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Feb 1;39(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad194.
2
Which factors promote and prohibit successful implementation and normalization of a healthy school lunch program at primary schools in the Netherlands?哪些因素促进和阻碍了荷兰小学成功实施和常态化健康学校午餐计划?
J Health Popul Nutr. 2022 Oct 15;41(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41043-022-00328-4.
3
Children's School-Day Nutrient Intake in Ontario: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study Comparing Students' Packed Lunches from Two School Schedules.
安大略省儿童学校日营养摄入:比较两种校历学生的盒装午餐的横断面观察研究。
Nutrients. 2022 May 8;14(9):1966. doi: 10.3390/nu14091966.
4
Increased School Breakfast Participation from Policy and Program Innovation: The Community Eligibility Provision and Breakfast after the Bell.从政策和项目创新看学校早餐参与度的提高:社区资格条款和课后早餐。
Nutrients. 2022 Jan 25;14(3):511. doi: 10.3390/nu14030511.
5
Gender Differences in Nutritional Quality and Consumption of Lunches Brought from Home to School.家庭带往学校午餐的营养质量和消费的性别差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;18(24):13168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413168.
6
The Good Food for Learning Universal Curriculum-Integrated Healthy School Lunch Intervention: Protocol for a Two-Year Matched Control Pre-Post and Case Study.“学习的优质食物”通用课程整合式健康学校午餐干预:一项为期两年的配对对照前后测及案例研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 21;10(9):e30899. doi: 10.2196/30899.
7
Impact of the Community Eligibility Provision on meal counts and participation in Pennsylvania and Maryland National School Lunch Programs.社区资格条款对宾夕法尼亚州和马里兰州国家学校午餐计划的用餐计数和参与的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(17):3281-3287. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002246. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
8
Comparisons of school and home-packed lunches for fruit and vegetable dietary behaviours among school-aged youths.比较学龄期青少年在校内和家庭包装的午餐中水果和蔬菜的饮食行为。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jul;22(10):1850-1857. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900017X. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
9
A Vote for School Lunches: School Lunches Provide Superior Nutrient Quality than Lunches Obtained from Other Sources in a Nationally Representative Sample of US Children.支持学校午餐:在全美代表性的美国儿童样本中,与从其他来源获得的午餐相比,学校午餐提供更优的营养质量。
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 24;9(9):924. doi: 10.3390/nu9090924.
10
The baseline characteristics of parents and African American girls in an online obesity prevention program: A feasibility study.一项在线肥胖预防计划中父母及非裔美国女孩的基线特征:一项可行性研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2017 May 19;7:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.05.011. eCollection 2017 Sep.