Suppr超能文献

通过损伤-症状映射揭示的言语识别记忆中可辨别性和标准设定的不同解剖学关联。

Distinct anatomical correlates of discriminability and criterion setting in verbal recognition memory revealed by lesion-symptom mapping.

作者信息

Biesbroek J Matthijs, van Zandvoort Martine J E, Kappelle L Jaap, Schoo Linda, Kuijf Hugo J, Velthuis Birgitta K, Biessels Geert Jan, Postma Albert

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Utrecht Stroke Center, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Apr;36(4):1292-303. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22702. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

Abstract

Recognition memory, that is, the ability to judge whether an item has been previously encountered in a particular context, depends on two factors: discriminability and criterion setting. Discriminability draws on memory processes while criterion setting (i.e., the application of a threshold resulting in a yes/no response) is regarded as a process of cognitive control. Discriminability and criterion setting are assumed to draw on distinct anatomical structures, but definite evidence for this assumption is lacking. We applied voxel-based and region of interest-based lesion-symptom mapping to 83 patients in the acute phase of ischemic stroke to determine the anatomical correlates of discriminability and criterion setting in verbal recognition memory. Recognition memory was measured with the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Signal-detection theory was used to calculate measures for discriminability and criterion setting. Lesion-symptom mapping revealed that discriminability draws on left medial temporal and temporo-occipital structures, both thalami and the right hippocampus, while criterion setting draws on the right inferior frontal gyrus. Lesions in the right inferior frontal gyrus were associated with liberal response bias. These findings indicate that discriminability and criterion setting indeed depend on distinct anatomical structures and provide new insights in the anatomical correlates of these cognitive processes that underlie verbal recognition memory.

摘要

识别记忆,即判断一个项目是否曾在特定情境中出现过的能力,取决于两个因素:可辨别性和标准设定。可辨别性依赖于记忆过程,而标准设定(即应用一个阈值以产生是/否反应)被视为一种认知控制过程。可辨别性和标准设定被认为依赖于不同的解剖结构,但缺乏支持这一假设的确切证据。我们对83例缺血性中风急性期患者应用基于体素和基于感兴趣区域的病变-症状映射,以确定言语识别记忆中可辨别性和标准设定的解剖学关联。使用雷伊听觉词语学习测验测量识别记忆。信号检测理论用于计算可辨别性和标准设定的指标。病变-症状映射显示,可辨别性依赖于左内侧颞叶和颞枕叶结构、双侧丘脑以及右侧海马体,而标准设定依赖于右侧额下回。右侧额下回的病变与宽松反应偏差相关。这些发现表明,可辨别性和标准设定确实依赖于不同的解剖结构,并为这些构成言语识别记忆基础的认知过程的解剖学关联提供了新的见解。

相似文献

3
The anatomy of visuospatial construction revealed by lesion-symptom mapping.通过病变-症状映射揭示的视觉空间构建解剖学
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Sep;62:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

3
Language Impairment in Vascular Dementia: A Clinical Review.血管性痴呆的语言障碍:临床综述。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2024 Mar;37(2):87-95. doi: 10.1177/08919887231195225. Epub 2023 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Human brain lesion-deficit inference remapped.人类脑损伤-缺陷推理重新映射。
Brain. 2014 Sep;137(Pt 9):2522-31. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu164. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
6
The differing roles of the frontal cortex in fluency tests.额叶皮层在流畅性测试中的不同作用。
Brain. 2012 Jul;135(Pt 7):2202-14. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws142. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验