Seydi Masoumeh, Rahimian Boogar Isaac, Talepasand Siavash
Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Mahdishahr, Semnan, Iran.
School of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Mahdishahr, Semnan, Iran.
Iran J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;14(4):274-282.
This study aimed to model risky driving and predict its occurrence according to the constructs of personality organization and mentalization considering the role of aggressive driving as a mediator construct. A total of 428 individuals (219 men and 209 women) were selected using convenience sampling. The participants completed self-report questionnaires on aggressive driving, risky driving, mentalization and personality organization Also, data were analyzed using structural equating model and weighted regression. The results of this study showed a goof fit of the proposed structural model for predicting risky driving after some modifications (CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.09). According to the results of regression weights, personality organization (regression weighted: 0.044) and aggressive driving (regression weighted: 0.98) were the strongest and mentalization (regression weighted: 0.004) was the weakest predictor of risky driving. Aggressive driving was the strongest direct predictor and personality organization the strongest indirect predictor of risky driving. Risky driving is a function of direct and indirect personal factors. Moreover, emotional factors have a direct effect on risky driving and more substantial constructs, such as personality, have an indirect effect on risky driving.
本研究旨在根据人格组织和心理化的结构对危险驾驶进行建模，并预测其发生情况，同时考虑攻击性驾驶作为中介结构的作用。采用便利抽样法共选取了428名个体（219名男性和209名女性）。参与者完成了关于攻击性驾驶、危险驾驶、心理化和人格组织的自我报告问卷。此外，使用结构方程模型和加权回归对数据进行了分析。本研究结果表明，经过一些修改后，所提出的用于预测危险驾驶的结构模型拟合良好（CFI = 0.95，RMSEA = 0.09）。根据回归权重结果，人格组织（回归权重：0.044）和攻击性驾驶（回归权重：0.98）是危险驾驶最强的预测因素，而心理化（回归权重：0.004）是最弱的预测因素。攻击性驾驶是危险驾驶最强的直接预测因素，人格组织是危险驾驶最强的间接预测因素。危险驾驶是直接和间接个人因素的函数。此外，情感因素对危险驾驶有直接影响，而更重要的结构因素，如人格，对危险驾驶有间接影响。
