Perdreau Florian, Cavanagh Patrick
Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 8242, Paris, France; e-mail:
Iperception. 2014 May 6;5(2):101-19. doi: 10.1068/i0635. eCollection 2014.
Accurate drawing calls on many skills beyond simple motor coordination. A good internal representation of the target object's structure is necessary to capture its proportion and shape in the drawing. Here, we assess two aspects of the perception of object structure and relate them to participants' drawing accuracy. First, we assessed drawing accuracy by computing the geometrical dissimilarity of their drawing to the target object. We then used two tasks to evaluate the efficiency of encoding object structure. First, to examine the rate of temporal encoding, we varied presentation duration of a possible versus impossible test object in the fovea using two different test sizes (8° and 28°). More skilled participants were faster at encoding an object's structure, but this difference was not affected by image size. A control experiment showed that participants skilled in drawing did not have a general advantage that might have explained their faster processing for object structure. Second, to measure the critical image size for accurate classification in the periphery, we varied image size with possible versus impossible object tests centered at two different eccentricities (3° and 8°). More skilled participants were able to categorise object structure at smaller sizes, and this advantage did not change with eccentricity. A control experiment showed that the result could not be attributed to differences in visual acuity, leaving attentional resolution as a possible explanation. Overall, we conclude that drawing accuracy is related to faster encoding of object structure and better access to crowded details.
精确绘图需要的技能远不止简单的运动协调。要在绘图中准确呈现目标物体的比例和形状,对其结构有良好的内部表征是必要的。在此,我们评估了物体结构感知的两个方面,并将它们与参与者的绘图准确性相关联。首先,我们通过计算他们的绘图与目标物体的几何差异来评估绘图准确性。然后,我们使用两项任务来评估编码物体结构的效率。第一,为了检验时间编码的速率,我们使用两种不同的测试尺寸(8°和28°),改变中央凹中可能与不可能的测试物体的呈现持续时间。绘图更熟练的参与者在编码物体结构时速度更快,但这种差异不受图像大小的影响。一项对照实验表明,绘图熟练的参与者并没有普遍优势来解释他们对物体结构的更快处理。第二,为了测量周边精确分类的临界图像大小,我们以两个不同的偏心度(3°和8°)为中心,在可能与不可能的物体测试中改变图像大小。绘图更熟练的参与者能够在更小的尺寸下对物体结构进行分类,并且这种优势不会随偏心度而改变。一项对照实验表明,该结果不能归因于视力差异,注意力分辨率可能是一个解释。总体而言,我们得出结论,绘图准确性与物体结构的更快编码以及对拥挤细节的更好获取有关。