BinDhim Nasser F, Hawkey Alexandra, Trevena Lyndal
1 School of Public Health, University of Sydney , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia .
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Feb;21(2):97-104. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0088. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
There are large numbers of health-related applications (apps) available in various app stores for many smartphone devices. Consequently, increasing numbers of articles are attempting to evaluate the content and the quality of health-related smartphone apps for specific health conditions. The aim of this article is to describe and summarize the methodologies used to determine the quality of health-related apps targeting health consumers and to propose a set of criteria for evaluating the quality of smartphone health-related apps.
In 2013, literature searches were performed using Medline and CINAHL, and we included all articles that had the aim of assessing the quality of health-related smartphone apps. The assessment method used in these studies was summarized and scored using a set of quality criteria developed for this study.
From 606 articles generated by the search, only 10 met the inclusion criteria. Based on our quality criteria, the mean score was 5.05 out of 8 (range, 2-7). Eighty percent of the studies did not identify the app store country in which the apps were found. Forty percent of the studies did not clearly mention whether they only had assessed the app description or had downloaded the app content for evaluation. Sixty percent of the studies did not provide a list of the apps they had evaluated. Overall, we identified six evaluation methodologies used to assess the quality of health-related apps described in RESULTS.
This article provides a summary of currently used methods for assessing the quality of smartphone health-related apps and proposes a set of criteria to enable future studies to consistently review health-related app quality in a standardized manner.
各类应用商店中为众多智能手机设备提供了大量与健康相关的应用程序(应用)。因此,越来越多的文章试图针对特定健康状况评估与健康相关的智能手机应用的内容和质量。本文旨在描述和总结用于确定面向健康消费者的与健康相关应用质量的方法,并提出一套评估智能手机健康相关应用质量的标准。
2013年,使用Medline和CINAHL进行文献检索,我们纳入了所有旨在评估与健康相关的智能手机应用质量的文章。使用为本研究制定的一套质量标准对这些研究中使用的评估方法进行总结和评分。
在检索到的606篇文章中,只有10篇符合纳入标准。根据我们的质量标准,平均得分为8分中的5.05分(范围为2 - 7分)。80%的研究未指明发现应用的应用商店所在国家。40%的研究未明确提及他们是仅评估了应用描述还是下载了应用内容进行评估。60%的研究未提供他们所评估应用的列表。总体而言,我们在“结果”部分确定了六种用于评估与健康相关应用质量的评估方法。
本文总结了当前用于评估智能手机健康相关应用质量的方法,并提出了一套标准,以使未来的研究能够以标准化方式持续审查与健康相关的应用质量。