Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤后生活质量相关的跨文化问题综述。

Review of cross-cultural issues related to quality of life after spinal cord injury.

作者信息

Tate Denise, Forchheimer Martin

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor.

出版信息

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014 Summer;20(3):181-90. doi: 10.1310/sci2003-181.

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is a dynamic concept that means different things to different people, both in the general public and within the research community. Because of this, a common definition of QOL has been hard to achieve. This article reviews cross-cultural issues related to QOL research in spinal cord injury (SCI). Many factors influence QOL for persons with SCI, including observable and objective indicators and subjective self-report ones. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Function, Disability and Health is used in this article as a framework to better understand how these factors may influence QOL. A number of important steps are summarized with respect to measurement issues in QOL. A comparison between data from 2 countries (United States and Brazil) using the International SCI QOL Basic Data Set shows similarities in scores and good reliability in the Brazilian sample. Substantial, significant correlations were observed among the SCI QOL Basic Data Set items and the WHOQOL-BREF within the US sample. The article ends with a set of recommendations for the development of cross-cultural measures of QOL for use in the SCI population.

摘要

生活质量(QOL)是一个动态概念,对于普通大众和研究界的不同人群而言有着不同的含义。正因如此,很难达成一个关于生活质量的通用定义。本文回顾了与脊髓损伤(SCI)生活质量研究相关的跨文化问题。许多因素会影响脊髓损伤患者的生活质量,包括可观察和客观的指标以及主观的自我报告指标。本文采用世界卫生组织的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》作为框架,以更好地理解这些因素如何影响生活质量。关于生活质量测量问题总结了一些重要步骤。使用国际脊髓损伤生活质量基本数据集对两个国家(美国和巴西)的数据进行比较,结果显示巴西样本的得分具有相似性且可靠性良好。在美国样本中,脊髓损伤生活质量基本数据集项目与世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)之间存在显著的相关性。文章最后针对开发用于脊髓损伤人群的跨文化生活质量测量方法提出了一系列建议。

相似文献

1
Review of cross-cultural issues related to quality of life after spinal cord injury.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014 Summer;20(3):181-90. doi: 10.1310/sci2003-181.
2
Good validity of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set.
Spinal Cord. 2016 Apr;54(4):314-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.99. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
3
Cross-cultural validity of four quality of life scales in persons with spinal cord injury.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Sep 3;8:94. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-94.
4
A cross-cultural mixed methods validation study of the spinal cord injury quality of life basic dataset (SCI QoL-BDS).
Spinal Cord. 2022 Feb;60(2):177-186. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00742-1. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
5
Quality of life in and after spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a longitudinal multicenter study.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014 Summer;20(3):197-207. doi: 10.1310/sci2003-197.
6
Quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury: comparisons with other populations.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Sep;17(1 Suppl):29-37. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.AOSPINE1252.
7
Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a comparison across six countries.
Spinal Cord. 2013 Apr;51(4):322-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.128. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
8
Capturing the psychologic-personal perspective in spinal cord injury.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;90(11 Suppl 2):S79-96. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fb68.
9
Quality of life in adults with spinal cord injury living in the community.
Spinal Cord. 2011 Mar;49(3):365-70. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.102. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
10
Identifying and classifying quality of life tools for assessing spasticity after spinal cord injury.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014 Summer;20(3):208-24. doi: 10.1310/sci2003-208.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of venlafaxine XR for major depressive disorder after spinal cord injury: Methods and lessons learned.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 May;37(3):247-63. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000138. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
2
Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a comparison across six countries.
Spinal Cord. 2013 Apr;51(4):322-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.128. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
3
Spinal cord injury and quality of life: a systematic review of outcome measures.
Evid Based Spine Care J. 2011 Feb;2(1):37-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267085.
4
International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set.
Spinal Cord. 2012 Sep;50(9):672-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.27. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
5
Developing a contemporary patient-reported outcomes measure for spinal cord injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10 Suppl):S44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.024.
7
Recommendations for translation and reliability testing of International Spinal Cord Injury Data Sets.
Spinal Cord. 2011 Mar;49(3):357-60. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.153. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
8
Cross-cultural validity of four quality of life scales in persons with spinal cord injury.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Sep 3;8:94. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-94.
9
Issues in participation measurement in research and clinical applications.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Sep;91(9 Suppl):S72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.031.
10
Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.
Spinal Cord. 2010 Jun;48(6):438-50. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.164. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验