• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于实验室的新型弹性牙刷头研究。

A laboratory based investigation of a new elastic toothbrush head.

作者信息

Mazza Lorenzo, Gatto Maria Rosaria, Monaco Giuseppe, Pelliccioni Gian Andrea

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna School of Dentistry, Via San Vitale 59, 40125 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:763968. doi: 10.1155/2014/763968. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1155/2014/763968
PMID:25485301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4251081/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the noninferiority of a new toothbrush head with retractile bristles compared to traditional toothbrush heads on dental models.

METHODS

The new toothbrush head, mounted on manual and electrical handles, presents retractile bristle groups that can singularly retract over its entire length and offer calibrated resistance. Fourteen gypsum models of dental arches, twelve with and two without anatomical impairments, were spread with a "plaque simulator." Each arch was brushed twice with each of the four toothbrushes, one minute by the same operator, blinded to the study. The plaque index (PI) was recorded at the end of each brushing session. GLM for repeated measures analysed the data.

RESULTS

On all the casts, the manual prototype and the electric prototype, removed 11% and 14% more "plaque simulator" compared to the standard toothbrush. In presence of dental anomalies, the prototypes removed 13% and 16% more plaque, respectively, compared to standard toothbrushes (P = 0.04). In both situations, the 95% confidence intervals of PI did not include -10% (the minimal margin of clinical relevance).

CONCLUSIONS

The prototype is more effective in removing plaque from the casts with anomalies. The noninferiority of the prototype with respect to the standard toothbrushes was demonstrated.

摘要

目的

在牙科模型上证明一种带有可收缩刷毛的新型牙刷头相较于传统牙刷头的非劣效性。

方法

安装在手动和电动手柄上的新型牙刷头具有可收缩刷毛组,这些刷毛组可在其整个长度上单独收缩并提供校准阻力。14个牙弓石膏模型,其中12个有解剖学损伤,2个没有,均涂抹了“菌斑模拟器”。每个牙弓用四把牙刷中的每一把各刷两次,由同一名操作者操作一分钟,操作者对研究情况不知情。每次刷牙结束时记录菌斑指数(PI)。重复测量的广义线性模型分析数据。

结果

在所有模型上,手动原型和电动原型与标准牙刷相比,清除的“菌斑模拟器”分别多11%和14%。在存在牙齿异常的情况下,与标准牙刷相比,原型分别多清除13%和16%的菌斑(P = 0.04)。在两种情况下,PI的95%置信区间均未包含-10%(临床相关性的最小界限)。

结论

该原型在从有异常的模型上清除菌斑方面更有效。证明了该原型相对于标准牙刷的非劣效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99d1/4251081/f8edd21f4c24/TSWJ2014-763968.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99d1/4251081/57567c5c5baa/TSWJ2014-763968.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99d1/4251081/f8edd21f4c24/TSWJ2014-763968.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99d1/4251081/57567c5c5baa/TSWJ2014-763968.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99d1/4251081/f8edd21f4c24/TSWJ2014-763968.002.jpg

相似文献

1
A laboratory based investigation of a new elastic toothbrush head.一项基于实验室的新型弹性牙刷头研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:763968. doi: 10.1155/2014/763968. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
2
Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.一款具有微脉冲刷毛和先进分体刷头设计的新型手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除功效。
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):49-54.
3
An investigation into the effect of three months' clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies.三个月临床使用对牙刷功效影响的调查:两项独立研究的结果
J Clin Dent. 2003;14(2):29-33.
4
Plaque removal efficacy of a prototype power toothbrush compared to a positive control manual toothbrush.与阳性对照手动牙刷相比,一款原型电动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。
Am J Dent. 2003 Aug;16(4):223-7.
5
Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal.两款电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的比较疗效
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(3):95-9.
6
The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.六种电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的相对有效性。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):198-202.
7
Comparative plaque removal efficacy of two new powered toothbrushes and a manual toothbrush.两款新型电动牙刷与一款手动牙刷去除牙菌斑效果的比较
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(2):1-5.
8
[Effect of different kinds of toothbrushes on toothbrushing pressure and plaque removal in the scrubbing method of toothbrushing (5). Toothbrushes with nylon bristles arranged in different lengths along the toothbrush shank and with different types of toothbrush bristle tip].[不同类型牙刷对刷牙擦刷法中刷牙压力及牙菌斑清除的影响(5)。刷毛沿刷柄排列长度不同且刷毛尖端类型不同的尼龙刷毛牙刷]
Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi. 1989 Dec;31(4):1197-206. doi: 10.2329/perio.31.1197.
9
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.
10
One- and 3-minute plaque removal by a battery-powered versus a manual toothbrush.电动牙刷与手动牙刷在1分钟和3分钟内清除牙菌斑的效果比较。
J Periodontol. 2004 Aug;75(8):1107-13. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.8.1107.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of manual versus powered toothbrushes for plaque removal and gingival health: A meta-analysis.手动牙刷与电动牙刷在清除牙菌斑及维护牙龈健康方面的效果:一项荟萃分析。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Apr;16(2):156-60. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.99255.
2
Biofilm removal and gingival abrasion with medium and soft toothbrushes.使用中、软毛牙刷去除生物膜和牙龈磨损。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2011;9(2):177-83.
3
The plaque-removing efficacy of a single-tufted brush on the lingual and buccal surfaces of the molars.单束毛牙刷对磨牙舌面和颊面的菌斑清除效果。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011 Jun;41(3):131-4. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2011.41.3.131. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
4
Interproximal access efficacy of one vibrating and two powered oscillating-rotating toothbrushes.一款振动式牙刷和两款电动振荡旋转式牙刷的邻面清洁效果
J Clin Dent. 2011;22(2):55-8.
5
The plaque removal efficacy of a novel power brush head.一种新型电动刷头的牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Dent. 2011;22(1):19-22.
6
Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health.用于控制牙菌斑和维护牙龈健康的不同动力牙刷。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;2010(12):CD004971. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004971.pub2.
7
Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes.两种手动牙刷的安全性和有效性。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2010 Nov;8(4):280-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00475.x.
8
Interproximal access efficacy of three manual toothbrushes with extended, x-angled or flat multitufted bristles.三种带有加长、X 形或平面多束刷毛的手动牙刷的邻间清洁效果。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2010 Aug;8(3):244-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00453.x.
9
A clinical evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of five manual toothbrushes.五种手动牙刷去除牙菌斑功效的临床评估
J Clin Dent. 2010;21(1):8-12.
10
Plaque control effectiveness and handling of interdental brushes during multibracket treatment--a randomized clinical trial.多托槽矫治中菌斑控制效果和牙间隙刷的使用——一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Aug;32(4):408-13. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp088. Epub 2009 Dec 3.