Roncero Carlos, de Almeida Roberto G
Department of Psychology, Concordia University Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 2;8:973. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00973. eCollection 2014.
We investigated the effect of aptness in the comprehension of copular metaphors (e.g., Lawyers are sharks) by Alzheimer's Disease (AD) patients. Aptness is the extent to which the vehicle (e.g., shark) captures salient properties of the topic (e.g., lawyers). A group of AD patients provided interpretations for metaphors that varied both in aptness and familiarity. Compared to healthy controls, AD patients produced worse interpretations, but interpretation ability was related to a metaphor's aptness rather than to its familiarity level, and patients with superior abstraction ability produced better interpretations. Therefore, the ability to construct figurative interpretations for metaphors is not always diminished in AD patients nor is it dependent only on the novelty level of the expression. We show that Alzheimer's patients' capacity to build figurative interpretations for metaphors is related to both item variables, such as aptness, and participant variables, such as abstraction ability.
我们研究了阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者对系词隐喻(如“律师是鲨鱼”)理解中的恰当性效应。恰当性是指喻体(如鲨鱼)捕捉主题(如律师)显著特征的程度。一组AD患者对恰当性和熟悉度各异的隐喻进行了解释。与健康对照组相比,AD患者的解释更差,但解释能力与隐喻的恰当性相关,而非与熟悉度相关,且抽象能力较强的患者解释得更好。因此,AD患者构建隐喻形象化解释的能力并非总是受损,也并非仅取决于表达的新颖程度。我们表明,阿尔茨海默病患者构建隐喻形象化解释的能力既与诸如恰当性等项目变量有关,也与诸如抽象能力等参与者变量有关。