Mishori Ranit, Hannaford Alisse, Mujawar Imran, Ferdowsian Hope, Kureshi Sarah
Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Pre-Clinical Building, GC-01D, 3900 Reservoir Rd. NW, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2016 Feb;18(1):210-8. doi: 10.1007/s10903-014-0144-2.
Many clinicians perform asylum evaluations yet no studies describe the motivation to perform them or their perceived rewards. The number of asylum seekers in the US is increasing and more clinicians are needed as evaluators. A survey to an asylum evaluators' network asked participants to qualitatively reflect on their experience and motivation. Answers were analyzed for themes and sentiment. Respondents cited commitment to humanistic and moral values, noted personal and family experiences, having skills, expertise, and career interests as drivers. They found the experience very rewarding personally and professionally, and in their perceived benefit to asylees. Negative sentiment was less frequent and centered on emotions related to client narratives. Process-oriented frustrations were also noted. This is the first published study describing clinicians' motivation and experience with asylum evaluations. It may illuminate clinicians' drive to volunteer, and serve as a resource for organizations for recruitment and education.
许多临床医生进行庇护评估,但尚无研究描述进行此类评估的动机或他们所感知到的回报。美国寻求庇护者的数量在增加,需要更多临床医生担任评估人员。一项针对庇护评估人员网络的调查要求参与者定性地反思他们的经历和动机。对答案进行了主题和情感分析。受访者提到致力于人文和道德价值观、提及个人和家庭经历、拥有技能、专业知识以及职业兴趣是驱动因素。他们发现这种经历在个人和职业方面都非常有意义,并且认为对寻求庇护者有益。负面情绪较少见,集中在与客户叙述相关的情绪上。还提到了以过程为导向的挫折感。这是第一篇发表的描述临床医生进行庇护评估的动机和经历的研究。它可能会阐明临床医生志愿参与的动力,并为组织招聘和教育提供资源。