Miller Riane N, Fagan Abigail A, Wright Emily M
University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
J Drug Issues. 2014 Oct;44(4):362-380. doi: 10.1177/0022042614526995.
General strain theory (GST) hypothesizes that youth are more likely to engage in delinquency when they experience vicarious victimization, defined as knowing about or witnessing violence perpetrated against others, but that this relationship may be attenuated for those who receive social support from significant others. Based on prospective data from youth aged 8 to 17 participating in the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN), this article found mixed support for these hypotheses. Controlling for prior involvement in delinquency, as well as other risk and protective factors, adolescents who reported more vicarious victimization had an increased likelihood of alcohol use in the short term, but not the long term, and victimization was not related to tobacco or marijuana use. Peer support did not moderate the relationship between vicarious victimization and substance use, but family support did. In contrast to strain theory's predictions, the relationship between vicarious victimization and substance use was stronger for those who had higher compared with lower levels of family support. Implications of these findings for strain theory and future research are discussed.
一般紧张理论(GST)假设,当年轻人经历替代性受害时,即了解或目睹针对他人的暴力行为时,他们更有可能从事犯罪活动,但对于那些从重要他人那里获得社会支持的人来说,这种关系可能会减弱。基于参与芝加哥邻里人类发展项目(PHDCN)的8至17岁青少年的前瞻性数据,本文对这些假设的支持情况不一。在控制了先前的犯罪参与以及其他风险和保护因素后,报告更多替代性受害经历的青少年在短期内饮酒的可能性增加,但长期来看并非如此,而且受害经历与吸烟或使用大麻无关。同伴支持并未调节替代性受害与物质使用之间的关系,但家庭支持起到了调节作用。与紧张理论的预测相反,家庭支持水平较高的人与较低的人相比,替代性受害与物质使用之间的关系更强。本文讨论了这些发现对紧张理论和未来研究的启示。