School of Nursing, Yale University, West Haven, CT, USA.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2016 Mar;17(2):120-6. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12240. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
Low income has been established as a risk factor for poorer outcomes in youth with type 1 diabetes; however, the effect of moderate income has not been studied. The purpose of this secondary analysis of baseline data from a multi-site study was to compare glycemic control, self-management, and psychosocial outcomes [depression, stress, and quality of life (QOL)] at different income levels in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Youth (n = 320, mean age = 12.3 + 1.1, 55% female, 64% white, mean A1C = 8.3 ± 1.4) completed established self-management and psychosocial measures. A1C levels were collected from medical records. Caregivers reported annual family income, categorized as high (>$80K), moderate ($40-80K), or low (<$40K). Youth from high-income families had significantly lower A1C (mean = 7.9 ± 1.2) than those from the moderate-income group (8.6 ± 1.7, p < 0.001) or the low-income group (mean A1C = 8.6 ± 1.5, p = 0.003). Youth from the high-income group reported significantly better diabetes problem solving and more self-management goals than those from the moderate- or low-income groups (both p < 0.01). Youth from the high-income group also reported significantly fewer symptoms of depression, lower levels of perceived stress, and better QOL than those in the moderate or low-income groups (all p < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression models were used to test psychological and behavioral predictors of A1C and QOL. Parents' education status (p < 0.05) and self-management activities (p < 0.01) were significant predictors of hemoglobin A1c, while income (p < 0.01) and self-management activities (p < 0.05) were significant predictors of QOL.
低收入已被确定为青少年 1 型糖尿病患者预后较差的风险因素;然而,中等收入的影响尚未得到研究。本研究对多中心研究基线数据进行二次分析,旨在比较不同收入水平的青少年 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制、自我管理和心理社会结局(抑郁、压力和生活质量(QOL))。研究对象(n = 320,平均年龄 12.3 ± 1.1 岁,55%为女性,64%为白人,平均 A1C 为 8.3 ± 1.4)完成了既定的自我管理和心理社会评估。A1C 水平从病历中收集。照顾者报告了家庭年收入,分为高(>$80K)、中($40-80K)和低(<$40K)。高收入家庭的青少年 A1C 显著低于中等收入组(7.9 ± 1.2)和低收入组(8.6 ± 1.5,p < 0.001)。高收入组青少年在解决糖尿病问题和设定更多自我管理目标方面的报告显著优于中低收入组(均 p < 0.01)。高收入组青少年报告的抑郁症状、感知压力水平和生活质量均显著低于中低收入组(均 p < 0.05)。多元线性回归模型用于检验 A1C 和 QOL 的心理和行为预测因子。父母的教育程度(p < 0.05)和自我管理活动(p < 0.01)是血红蛋白 A1c 的显著预测因子,而收入(p < 0.01)和自我管理活动(p < 0.05)是 QOL 的显著预测因子。