• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意识形态分歧与气候变化观点:“自上而下”与“自下而上”的方法

The ideological divide and climate change opinion: "top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches.

作者信息

Jacquet Jennifer, Dietrich Monica, Jost John T

机构信息

Department of Environmental Studies, New York University , New York, NY, USA.

Department of Psychology, New York University , New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 18;5:1458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01458. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01458
PMID:25566136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4270167/
Abstract

The United States wields disproportionate global influence in terms of carbon dioxide emissions and international climate policy. This makes it an especially important context in which to examine the interplay among social, psychological, and political factors in shaping attitudes and behaviors related to climate change. In this article, we review the emerging literature addressing the liberal-conservative divide in the U.S. with respect to thought, communication, and action concerning climate change. Because of its theoretical and practical significance, we focus on the motivational basis for skepticism and inaction on the part of some, including "top-down" institutional forces, such as corporate strategy, and "bottom-up" psychological factors, such as ego, group, and system justification. Although more research is needed to elucidate fully the social, cognitive, and motivational bases of environmental attitudes and behavior, a great deal has been learned in just a few years by focusing on specific ideological factors in addition to general psychological principles.

摘要

在二氧化碳排放和国际气候政策方面,美国在全球具有不成比例的影响力。这使得美国成为一个特别重要的背景环境,可用于审视社会、心理和政治因素在塑造与气候变化相关的态度和行为时的相互作用。在本文中,我们回顾了新兴文献,这些文献探讨了美国在气候变化的思想、沟通和行动方面存在的自由派与保守派分歧。鉴于其理论和实践意义,我们关注一些人持怀疑态度和不作为的动机基础,包括“自上而下”的制度力量,如企业战略,以及“自下而上”的心理因素,如自我、群体和系统合理化。尽管需要更多研究来充分阐明环境态度和行为的社会、认知和动机基础,但通过关注除一般心理原则之外的特定意识形态因素,在短短几年内已经学到了很多东西。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7030/4270167/f145ec6a6f54/fpsyg-05-01458-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7030/4270167/f145ec6a6f54/fpsyg-05-01458-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7030/4270167/f145ec6a6f54/fpsyg-05-01458-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The ideological divide and climate change opinion: "top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches.意识形态分歧与气候变化观点:“自上而下”与“自下而上”的方法
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 18;5:1458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01458. eCollection 2014.
2
The end of the end of ideology.意识形态终结的终结。
Am Psychol. 2006 Oct;61(7):651-70. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651.
3
Disentangling the Importance of Psychological Predispositions and Social Constructions in the Organization of American Political Ideology.解析心理倾向和社会建构在美国政治意识形态组织中的重要性。
Polit Psychol. 2012 Jun 1;3(3):375-393. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00882.x. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
4
Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives.关注过去的环境比较促进了保守派的环保成果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 27;113(52):14953-14957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610834113. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
5
Effects of system-sanctioned framing on climate awareness and environmental action in the United States and beyond.美国及其他国家/地区体制认可的框架对气候意识和环境行动的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 17;121(38):e2405973121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405973121. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
6
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
7
Environmental attitudes and political partisanship.环境态度与政治党派倾向。
Public Health. 2014 May;128(5):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
8
Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: how to improve communication across ideological divides?评估意识形态对公众气候变化科学理解的影响:如何在意识形态分歧中改善沟通?
Public Underst Sci. 2010 Nov;19(6):743-61. doi: 10.1177/0963662509357871.
9
The differential impact of climate interventions along the political divide in 60 countries.60 个国家中政治分歧沿线气候干预措施的差异影响。
Nat Commun. 2024 May 8;15(1):3885. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48112-8.
10
The New Right and family politics.新右派与家庭政治。
Econ Soc. 1992 May;21(2):93-128. doi: 10.1080/03085149200000006.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing the effectiveness of heat adaptation strategies through citizen science-based outdoor thermal comfort.通过基于公民科学的户外热舒适度提高热适应策略的有效性。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 15;10(21):e39413. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39413. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
2
Effects of system-sanctioned framing on climate awareness and environmental action in the United States and beyond.美国及其他国家/地区体制认可的框架对气候意识和环境行动的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 17;121(38):e2405973121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405973121. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts.

本文引用的文献

1
Motivated recall in the service of the economic system: The case of anthropogenic climate change.为经济系统服务的动机性回忆:以人为气候变化为例。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jun;145(6):755-71. doi: 10.1037/xge0000148. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
2
Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology.意识形态:社会、人格和政治心理学中的复兴。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;3(2):126-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x.
3
Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief.解决方案厌恶:论意识形态与动机性怀疑之间的关系。
社会交际背景下政治两极分化的认知动机机制。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(10):560-576. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
4
Political ideology predicts preventative behaviors and infections amid COVID-19 in democracies.政治意识形态预测民主国家 COVID-19 期间的预防行为和感染。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;308:115199. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115199. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
5
Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States.美国在应对新冠疫情方面的政治两极分化。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Sep;179:110892. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
6
The US Response to COVID-19 and Climate Change Endangers the Country and the World.美国应对新冠疫情和气候变化的举措危及美国乃至全世界。
One Earth. 2020 Jun 19;2(6):503-505. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.020.
7
Editorial: Nature and the Environment: The Psychology of Its Benefits and Its Protection.社论:自然与环境:其益处及保护的心理学
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 25;6:1804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01804. eCollection 2015.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Nov;107(5):809-24. doi: 10.1037/a0037963.
4
Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology.消极偏见的差异是政治意识形态变化的基础。
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):297-307. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001192.
5
An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming.对科学的攻击?媒体使用、对科学家的信任以及对全球变暖的认知。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Oct;23(7):866-83. doi: 10.1177/0963662513480091. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
6
Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices.政治意识形态影响能源效率态度和选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 4;110(23):9314-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218453110. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
7
NASA faked the moon landing--therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science.美国国家航空航天局伪造了登月——因此,(气候)科学是一个骗局:科学受到动机驱动的拒绝的剖析。
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):622-33. doi: 10.1177/0956797612457686. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
8
Climate change communication: a provocative inquiry into motives, meanings, and means.气候变化传播:动机、意义和手段的挑衅性探究。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jun;32(6):973-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01731.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
9
Public understanding of climate change in the United States.公众对美国气候变化的认知。
Am Psychol. 2011 May-Jun;66(4):315-28. doi: 10.1037/a0023253.
10
Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs.世界末日要来了吗?与公正世界信念相矛盾的可怕信息降低了人们对全球变暖的信任。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):34-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797610391911. Epub 2010 Dec 9.