Boettiger Carl, Mangel Marc, Munch Stephan
Center for Stock Assessment Research, Department of Applied Math and Statistics, University of California, Mail Stop SOE-2, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
Center for Stock Assessment Research, Department of Applied Math and Statistics, University of California, Mail Stop SOE-2, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 22;282(1801):20141631. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1631.
Model uncertainty and limited data are fundamental challenges to robust management of human intervention in a natural system. These challenges are acutely highlighted by concerns that many ecological systems may contain tipping points, such as Allee population sizes. Before a collapse, we do not know where the tipping points lie, if they exist at all. Hence, we know neither a complete model of the system dynamics nor do we have access to data in some large region of state space where such a tipping point might exist. We illustrate how a Bayesian non-parametric approach using a Gaussian process (GP) prior provides a flexible representation of this inherent uncertainty. We embed GPs in a stochastic dynamic programming framework in order to make robust management predictions with both model uncertainty and limited data. We use simulations to evaluate this approach as compared with the standard approach of using model selection to choose from a set of candidate models. We find that model selection erroneously favours models without tipping points, leading to harvest policies that guarantee extinction. The Gaussian process dynamic programming (GPDP) performs nearly as well as the true model and significantly outperforms standard approaches. We illustrate this using examples of simulated single-species dynamics, where the standard model selection approach should be most effective and find that it still fails to account for uncertainty appropriately and leads to population crashes, while management based on the GPDP does not, as it does not underestimate the uncertainty outside of the observed data.
模型的不确定性和数据的有限性是对自然系统中人类干预进行稳健管理的根本挑战。许多生态系统可能包含诸如阿利效应种群规模等临界点,这种担忧使得这些挑战尤为突出。在崩溃之前,我们既不知道临界点在哪里,甚至不确定它们是否存在。因此,我们既没有系统动力学的完整模型,也无法获取状态空间中某个可能存在此类临界点的大区域的数据。我们说明了一种使用高斯过程(GP)先验的贝叶斯非参数方法如何灵活地表示这种内在的不确定性。我们将高斯过程嵌入到随机动态规划框架中,以便在模型不确定性和数据有限的情况下做出稳健的管理预测。与使用模型选择从一组候选模型中进行选择的标准方法相比,我们通过模拟来评估这种方法。我们发现,模型选择错误地倾向于没有临界点的模型,从而导致保证物种灭绝的捕捞政策。高斯过程动态规划(GPDP)的表现几乎与真实模型一样好,并且明显优于标准方法。我们通过模拟单物种动态的例子来说明这一点,在这种情况下标准模型选择方法应该是最有效的,但我们发现它仍然无法适当地考虑不确定性,导致种群崩溃,而基于GPDP的管理则不会,因为它不会低估观测数据之外的不确定性。