Suppr超能文献

长期噪声暴露与2型糖尿病风险:一项荟萃分析。

Long-term noise exposure and the risk for type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Dzhambov Angel Mario

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Noise Health. 2015 Jan-Feb;17(74):23-33. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.149571.

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is one of the leading causes for disability and mortality in modern societies. Apart from personal factors its incidence might be influenced by environmental risks such as air pollution and noise. This paper reports a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk for type 2 diabetes due to long-term noise exposure. Electronic searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Internet yielded 9 relevant studies (5 for residential and 4 for occupational exposure). They were checked against a predefined list of safeguards against bias producing individual quality scores, which were then fed to MetaXL to conduct a quality effects meta-analysis. People exposed at their homes to roughly L(den) > 60 dB had 22% higher risk (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.37) for type 2 diabetes in comparison to those exposed to L(den) < 64 dB; when studies reporting contentious exposure categories were excluded, there was still 19% risk (95% CI: 1.05-1.35) for L(den) = 60-70 dB versus L(den) < 60 dB. In occupational environment there was not significant risk (relative risk [RR] = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.78-1.06) for < 85 dB versus >85 dB. There was no heterogeneity in the two groups (I² = 0.00). The results should be interpreted with caution due to methodological discrepancies across the studies; however, they are indicative of the close links that noise pollution might have not only to cardiovascular diseases but to endocrine dysfunction as well.

摘要

糖尿病是现代社会导致残疾和死亡的主要原因之一。除个人因素外,其发病率可能受空气污染和噪音等环境风险的影响。本文报告了一项关于长期噪声暴露导致2型糖尿病风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。通过在MEDLINE、EMBASE和互联网上进行电子检索,获得了9项相关研究(5项关于住宅暴露,4项关于职业暴露)。根据预先定义的防止偏倚的保障措施清单对这些研究进行检查,得出个体质量评分,然后将其输入MetaXL进行质量效应荟萃分析。与暴露于L(den)<64 dB的人相比,在家中暴露于大致L(den)>60 dB的人患2型糖尿病的风险高22%(95%置信区间[CI]:1.09 - 1.37);当排除报告有争议暴露类别的研究时,对于L(den)= 60 - 70 dB与L(den)<60 dB,风险仍为19%(95% CI:1.05 - 1.35)。在职业环境中,<85 dB与>85 dB相比,风险不显著(相对风险[RR]=0.91,95% CI:0.78 - 1.06)。两组之间不存在异质性(I² = 0.00)。由于各研究在方法上存在差异,对结果的解释应谨慎;然而,这些结果表明噪声污染不仅可能与心血管疾病密切相关,还可能与内分泌功能障碍有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4424/4918642/838b9b677ec3/NH-17-23-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验