• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can health screening damage your health?健康筛查会损害你的健康吗?
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 May;39(322):193-5.
2
Screening for coronary heart disease risk among men in a general practice.在普通医疗实践中对男性冠心病风险进行筛查。
N Z Med J. 1995 May 10;108(999):167-8.
3
Screening for hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: randomised controlled trial of postal questionnaire appraising risk of coronary heart disease.基层医疗中高胆固醇血症的筛查:评估冠心病风险的邮政问卷随机对照试验。
BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1208-13. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1208.
4
The psychological impact of screening for risk of coronary heart disease in primary care settings.
J Cardiovasc Risk. 1998 Jun;5(3):185-91.
5
Socio-demographic characteristics as correlates of psychological distress.社会人口学特征与心理困扰的相关性
Int J Prison Health. 2018 Sep 10;14(3):210-219. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-10-2017-0042.
6
Coronary heart disease: account of a preventive clinic in general practice.冠心病:一家全科预防诊所的情况汇报
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Sep;34(266):477-81.
7
Readiness for lifestyle advice: self-assessments of coronary risk prior to screening in the British family heart study. Family Heart Study Group.生活方式建议的准备情况:英国家庭心脏研究中筛查前的冠心病风险自我评估。家庭心脏研究小组。
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jan;45(390):5-8.
8
Identification and treatment of risk factors for coronary heart disease in general practice: a possible screening model.全科医疗中冠心病危险因素的识别与治疗:一种可能的筛查模式。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Jun 18;296(6638):1711-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6638.1711.
9
Demographics, family histories, and psychological characteristics of prostate carcinoma screening participants.前列腺癌筛查参与者的人口统计学特征、家族史和心理特征。
Cancer. 1999 Mar 15;85(6):1305-12. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990315)85:6<1305::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-i.
10
Psychological consequences of screening for cardiovascular risk factors in an un-selected general population: results from the Inter99 randomised intervention study.在未经过筛选的普通人群中筛查心血管危险因素的心理后果:Inter99随机干预研究的结果
Scand J Public Health. 2015 Feb;43(1):102-10. doi: 10.1177/1403494814557886. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
"Am I carrier?" The patient's lived experience of thrombophilia genetic screening and its outcome.“我是携带者吗?” 患者对血栓形成倾向基因筛查的亲身经历及其结果。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2014 Jan 1;2(1):696-712. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2014.918512. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
2
Estimating the burden of disease in chronic pain with and without neuropathic characteristics: does the choice between the EQ-5D and SF-6D matter?评估伴有和不伴有神经病理性特征的慢性疼痛的疾病负担:EQ-5D和SF-6D之间的选择重要吗?
Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):1996-2004. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
3
Detection of heart disease by open access echocardiography: a retrospective analysis of general practice referrals.通过开放获取超声心动图检测心脏病:对全科医疗转诊病例的回顾性分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Feb;64(619):e105-11. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677167.
4
Neuropathic pain in the community: more under-treated than refractory?社区中的神经性疼痛:治疗不足而非难治?
Pain. 2013 May;154(5):690-699. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.022. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
5
Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.常规使用全球冠心病风险评分会转化为临床益处还是危害?一项文献系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 20;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-60.
6
Psychological factors associated with emotional responses to receiving genetic risk information.
J Genet Couns. 2008 Jun;17(3):234-41. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9136-x. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
7
Does population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study.对沙眼衣原体进行人群筛查会增加受检者的焦虑情绪吗?一项基于人群的衣原体筛查研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Apr 25;6:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-106.
8
Patients' responses to risk information about the benefits of treating hypertension.患者对高血压治疗益处的风险信息的反应。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;51(465):276-9.
9
Economic evaluation of cholesterol-related interventions in general practice. An appraisal of the evidence.全科医疗中胆固醇相关干预措施的经济学评估。证据评估。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Sep;52(9):586-94. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.9.586.
10
The UMDS MSc in general practice: attainment of intended outcomes.伦敦大学医学与牙医学士学位(UMDS)全科医学理学硕士课程:预期成果的达成情况。
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Nov;48(436):1765-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring social inequality: occupational classifications and their alternatives.衡量社会不平等:职业分类及其替代方法。
Community Med. 1983 May;5(2):116-24.
2
UK heart disease prevention project: incidence and mortality results.
Lancet. 1983 May 14;1(8333):1062-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91907-4.
3
Psychiatric illness in general practice. A detailed study using a new method of case identification.全科医疗中的精神疾病。一项采用新病例识别方法的详细研究。
Br Med J. 1970 May 23;1(5707):439-43. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5707.439.
4
Validation of screening procedures.筛查程序的验证
Br Med Bull. 1971 Jan;27(1):3-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070810.
5
Multiphasic checkup evaluation study. 4. Preliminary cost benefit analysis for middle-aged men.多相体检评估研究。4. 中年男性的初步成本效益分析。
Prev Med. 1973 Jun;2(2):236-46. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(73)90067-4.
6
Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients.高血压患者被检测和诊断后工作缺勤率增加。
N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 5;299(14):741-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810052991403.
7
Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research.文化、疾病与关怀:人类学及跨文化研究的临床启示
Ann Intern Med. 1978 Feb;88(2):251-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-88-2-251.

健康筛查会损害你的健康吗?

Can health screening damage your health?

作者信息

Stoate H G

出版信息

J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 May;39(322):193-5.

PMID:2560003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1712014/
Abstract

This study set out to determine whether screening can be psychologically harmful to healthy adults. A prospective controlled study was carried out on 215 healthy adults attending a by-invitation coronary heart disease screening clinic in general practice. The general health questionnaire was used as an indicator of recent psychological distress. Patients attending the screening clinic had significantly lower subjective psychological distress than an unscreened group of 225 age-matched controls, indicating that we may well be screening an already psychologically healthy sub-group. The main finding was that patients' own assessment of their psychological distress was significantly increased three months after screening compared with that of controls, who showed a non-significant decrease. It is concluded that there is a real risk of causing distress by screening healthy adults and that this possibility has largely been ignored by previous studies. Possible explanations and implications of these findings are discussed, particularly in the light of increased pressure from many quarters for more screening services to be set up in general practice.

摘要

本研究旨在确定筛查是否会对健康成年人造成心理伤害。对215名参加全科邀请式冠心病筛查诊所的健康成年人进行了一项前瞻性对照研究。使用一般健康问卷作为近期心理困扰的指标。参加筛查诊所的患者主观心理困扰明显低于225名年龄匹配的未筛查对照组,这表明我们筛查的很可能是一个心理上已经健康的亚组。主要发现是,与对照组相比,筛查后三个月患者对自身心理困扰的评估显著增加,而对照组则有不显著的下降。得出的结论是,对健康成年人进行筛查确实存在造成困扰的风险,而这种可能性在以前的研究中基本被忽视了。讨论了这些发现的可能解释和影响,特别是鉴于来自许多方面要求在全科医疗中设立更多筛查服务的压力不断增加。