Zaremba Tomas, Jakobsen Annette Ross, Søgaard Mette, Thøgersen Anna Margrethe, Johansen Martin Berg, Madsen Laerke Bruun, Riahi Sam
Department of Cardiology, Center for Cardiovascular Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Mar;38(3):343-56. doi: 10.1111/pace.12572. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
Pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) may develop malfunction during external beam radiotherapy (RT). We aimed to describe clinical practice in PM/ICD patients undergoing RT and to assess the rate and predictors of device malfunctions.
We reviewed medical records of all PM/ICD patients undergoing RT at four centers in Western Denmark during 2003-2012. Logistic regression was applied to identify predictors of PM/ICD malfunctions.
Five hundred sixty patients were included. The annual rate of RT courses in PM/ICD patients increased by 199% from 1.45 treatments per 100,000 person-years in 2003 to 4.33 in 2012. Safety measures included supplementary evaluations of PM/ICD (38.3%), reprogramming (1.5%), relocation of the device (3.5%), and application of a magnet to the ICD during RT (10.8%). At device evaluations after the RT (n = 453), malfunctions were detected in 10 (2.5%) PMs and four (6.8%) ICDs. Electrical resets constituted 11 (78.6%) of the malfunctions, and no failures were life-threatening or warranted PM/ICD removal. Factors associated with device malfunctions in logistic regression analysis were beam energy ≥15 MV (odds ratio [OR] 5.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-20.76) and location of tumor below the diaphragm (OR 4.31; 95% CI, 1.42-13.12). However, the effect of tumor location declined (OR 2.27; 95% CI, 0.65-7.95) after adjustment for beam energy.
Although the rate of RT in PM/ICD patients is increasing, the damaging effects of RT on the devices seem to be usually transient. Our data suggest that high beam energy plays the pivotal role in inducing impairments in these devices.
起搏器(PM)和植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)在体外放射治疗(RT)期间可能发生故障。我们旨在描述接受放疗的PM/ICD患者的临床实践,并评估设备故障的发生率和预测因素。
我们回顾了2003年至2012年期间在丹麦西部四个中心接受放疗的所有PM/ICD患者的病历。应用逻辑回归来确定PM/ICD故障的预测因素。
共纳入560例患者。PM/ICD患者的年度放疗疗程率从2003年每10万人年1.45次治疗增加到2012年的4.33次,增长了199%。安全措施包括对PM/ICD进行补充评估(38.3%)、重新编程(1.5%)、重新安置设备(3.5%)以及在放疗期间对ICD应用磁铁(10.8%)。在放疗后的设备评估中(n = 453),10台(2.5%)PM和4台(6.8%)ICD检测到故障。电重置占故障的11例(78.6%),且无故障危及生命或需要移除PM/ICD。逻辑回归分析中与设备故障相关的因素是束流能量≥15 MV(比值比[OR] 5.73;95%置信区间[CI],1.58 - 20.76)以及肿瘤位于膈肌下方(OR 4.31;95% CI,1.42 - 13.12)。然而,在调整束流能量后,肿瘤位置的影响下降(OR 2.27;95% CI,0.65 - 7.95)。
尽管PM/ICD患者的放疗率在增加,但放疗对设备的损害作用似乎通常是短暂的。我们的数据表明,高束流能量在导致这些设备受损方面起关键作用。