Rembach Alan, Stingo Francesco C, Peterson Christine, Vannucci Marina, Do Kim-Anh, Wilson William J, Macaulay S Lance, Ryan Timothy M, Martins Ralph N, Ames David, Masters Colin L, Doecke James D
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, Houston, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(3):917-25. doi: 10.3233/JAD-141497.
With different approaches to finding prognostic or diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD), many studies pursue only brief lists of biomarkers or disease specific pathways, potentially dismissing information from groups of correlated biomarkers. Using a novel Bayesian graphical network method, with data from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging, the aim of this study was to assess the biological connectivity between AD associated blood-based proteins. Briefly, three groups of protein markers (18, 37, and 48 proteins, respectively) were assessed for the posterior probability of biological connection both within and between clinical classifications. Clinical classification was defined in four groups: high performance healthy controls (hpHC), healthy controls (HC), participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and participants with AD. Using the smaller group of proteins, posterior probabilities of network similarity between clinical classifications were very high, indicating no difference in biological connections between groups. Increasing the number of proteins increased the capacity to separate both hpHC and HC apart from the AD group (0 for complete separation, 1 for complete similarity), with posterior probabilities shifting from 0.89 for the 18 protein group, through to 0.54 for the 37 protein group, and finally 0.28 for the 48 protein group. Using this approach, we identified beta-2 microglobulin (β2M) as a potential master regulator of multiple proteins across all classifications, demonstrating that this approach can be used across many data sets to identify novel insights into diseases like AD.
针对阿尔茨海默病(AD)预后或诊断生物标志物的研究方法各异,许多研究仅关注简短的生物标志物列表或疾病特异性途径,可能忽略了相关生物标志物组中的信息。本研究采用一种新颖的贝叶斯图形网络方法,利用澳大利亚影像、生物标志物和生活方式(AIBL)衰老研究的数据,旨在评估与AD相关的血液蛋白之间的生物学联系。简要来说,对三组蛋白质标志物(分别为18种、37种和48种蛋白质)进行了临床分类内和分类间生物学联系的后验概率评估。临床分类分为四组:高性能健康对照(hpHC)、健康对照(HC)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)参与者和AD参与者。使用较小的蛋白质组时,临床分类之间网络相似性的后验概率非常高,表明各组之间的生物学联系没有差异。增加蛋白质数量提高了将hpHC和HC与AD组区分开的能力(完全分离为0,完全相似为1),后验概率从18种蛋白质组的0.89,变为37种蛋白质组的0.54,最后变为48种蛋白质组的0.28。通过这种方法,我们确定β2微球蛋白(β2M)是所有分类中多种蛋白质的潜在主要调节因子,表明这种方法可用于许多数据集,以发现对AD等疾病的新见解。