Kumar Radhika, Srinivas Moogala, Pai Jagdish, Suragimath Girish, Prasad Krishna, Polepalle Tejaswin
Department of Periodontology, ECHS Polyclinic, Leh, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Nov-Dec;18(6):746-50. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.147411.
The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) in root coverage procedures as an adjunct to coronally advanced flap (CAF) procedure.
This was a randomized clinical trial with split mouth design, where 10 patients with 20 sites of Millers Class I recession were treated and followed-up for a period of 6 months. CAF procedure was performed, HA was applied onto the experimental sites before suturing the flap. Recession depth (RD) was measured regularly at baseline 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were also measured along with RD at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks.
There was a significant change in RD, PPD, CAL, and percentage of root coverage in both groups when compared to the baseline values. There was no statistically significant difference between experimental and control group in terms of RD (P = 0.917), PPD (P = 0.917) and CAL (P = 0.761). RD was 3.2 mm ± 0.78 mm in experimental site and control sites 2.9 mm ± 0.73 mm reduced to 1.1 mm ± 0.99 mm in experimental sites and 1.0 mm ± 0.66 mm in control sites. Though, there is no statistically significant difference root coverage in the experimental group appeared to be clinically more stable compared with the control group after 24 weeks.
This study suggests that use of HA may improve the clinical outcome of root coverage with CAF procedure.
本研究的目的是评估透明质酸(HA)作为冠向复位瓣(CAF)手术辅助手段在牙根覆盖手术中的疗效。
这是一项采用双侧对照设计的随机临床试验,10例患有20个米勒I类牙龈退缩位点的患者接受治疗并随访6个月。进行CAF手术,在缝合瓣之前将HA应用于试验位点。在术后基线、1、3、6、12和24周定期测量退缩深度(RD)。在基线以及12和24周时,还与RD一起测量探诊深度(PPD)和临床附着水平(CAL)。
与基线值相比,两组的RD、PPD、CAL和牙根覆盖百分比均有显著变化。试验组和对照组在RD(P = 0.917)、PPD(P = 0.917)和CAL(P = 0.761)方面无统计学显著差异。试验位点的RD为3.2 mm ± 0.78 mm,对照位点为2.9 mm ± 0.73 mm,试验位点降至1.1 mm ± 0.99 mm,对照位点降至1.0 mm ± 0.66 mm。虽然无统计学显著差异,但24周后试验组的牙根覆盖在临床上似乎比对照组更稳定。
本研究表明,使用HA可能会改善CAF手术牙根覆盖的临床效果。