Rahe Julia, Petrelli Annette, Kaesberg Stephanie, Fink Gereon R, Kessler Josef, Kalbe Elke
Psychological Gerontology and Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Interventions, Institute of Gerontology, University of Vechta, Vechta, Germany.
Cognitive Neurology Section, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Jan 19;10:297-310. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S74071. eCollection 2015.
Cognitive training (CT) has been reported to improve cognition in older adults. Its combination with protective factors such as physical activity (CPT) has rarely been studied, but it has been suggested that CPT might show stronger effects than pure CT.
Healthy older adults (aged 50-85 years) were trained with CPT (n=15) or CT (n=15). Interventions were conducted in 90-minute sessions twice weekly for 6.5 weeks. Cognitive functions were assessed before and immediately after the interventions, and at 1-year follow-up.
The main finding was an interaction effect on attention, with comparable gains from CPT and CT from pre- to post-test, but stronger effects of CPT to follow-up (P=0.02). Significant effects were found in subjects in terms of cognitive state (P=0.02), letter verbal fluency (P=0.00), and immediate (P=0.00) and delayed (P=0.01) verbal memory. Post hoc analyses indicated that these latter domains were affected differentially by CPT and CT. No significant between-subject effects were found.
Our results suggest that CPT might lead to stronger long-term effects on attention. However, as the difference between CT and CPT was only evident at follow-up, these effects cannot be interpreted as a direct consequence of CPT; they may have been related to sustained physical activity after the training. Other domains were improved by both interventions, but no typical pattern could be identified. Possible underlying mechanisms are discussed, and directions for future research are suggested.
据报道,认知训练(CT)可改善老年人的认知能力。其与体育活动等保护因素相结合的认知训练(CPT)很少被研究,但有人认为CPT可能比单纯的CT显示出更强的效果。
对健康的老年人(年龄在50 - 85岁之间)进行CPT训练(n = 15)或CT训练(n = 15)。干预每周进行两次,每次90分钟,共持续6.5周。在干预前、干预后立即以及1年随访时评估认知功能。
主要发现是在注意力方面存在交互作用,从测试前到测试后,CPT和CT的增益相当,但CPT在随访时的效果更强(P = 0.02)。在认知状态(P = 0.02)、字母言语流畅性(P = 0.00)、即时(P = 0.00)和延迟(P = 0.01)言语记忆方面,受试者有显著效果。事后分析表明,CPT和CT对这些后几个领域的影响有所不同。未发现显著的受试者间效应。
我们的结果表明,CPT可能对注意力产生更强的长期影响。然而,由于CT和CPT之间的差异仅在随访时明显,这些效果不能被解释为CPT的直接结果;它们可能与训练后的持续体育活动有关。两种干预都改善了其他领域,但未发现典型模式。讨论了可能的潜在机制,并提出了未来研究的方向。