Tøien Øivind, Blake John, Barnes Brian M
Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775-7000, USA,
J Comp Physiol B. 2015 May;185(4):447-61. doi: 10.1007/s00360-015-0891-y. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
Black bears overwintering in outdoor hibernacula in Alaska decrease metabolism to as low as 25 % basal rates, while core body temperature (T(b)) decreases from 37 to 38 °C to a mid-hibernation average of 33 °C. T b develops cycles of 1.6-7.3 days length within a 30-36 °C range, with no circadian component. We do not know the mechanism or function underlying behind the T(b) cycles, although bears avoid T(b) of <30 °C and shorter cycles are predicted from higher rates of heat loss in colder conditions. To test this we manipulated den temperatures (T(den)) of 12 hibernating bears with body mass (BM) from 35.5 to 116.5 kg while recording T(b), metabolic rate (M), and shivering. T b cycle length (0.8-11.2 days) shortened as T den decreased (partial R(2) = 0.490, p < 0.001). Large bears with low thermal conductance (TC) showed more variation in T b cycle length with changes in T(den) than did smaller bears with high TC. Minimum T b across cycles was not consistent. At low T(den) bears shivered both during rising and decreasing phases of T(b) cycles, with minimum shivering during the fastest drop in T(b). At higher T den the T b pattern was more irregular. Mean M through T(b) cycles was negatively correlated to T den below lower critical temperatures (1.4-10.4 °C). Minimum M (0.3509 W/kg ± 0.0121 SE) during mid-hibernation scaled to BM [M (W) = 1.217 × BM (kg)(0.6979), R(2) = 0.855, p < 0.001]. Hibernating thermal conductance (TC) was negatively correlated to BM (R(2) = 0.721, p < 0.001); bears with high TC had the same T(b) cycle length as bears with low TC except at high T(den), thus not supporting the hypothesis that cooling rate alone determines T(b) cycle length. We conclude that T(b) cycling is effected by control of thermoregulatory heat production, and T(b) cycling may not be present when hibernating bears use passive thermoregulation. More intense shivering in the rising phase of cycles may contribute to the prevention of muscle disuse atrophy. Bears hibernating in cold conditions use more energy during hibernation than in warmer conditions. At T den below lower critical temperature, no extra energy expenditure results from T b cycling compared to keeping a stable T(b.)
在阿拉斯加户外冬眠场所越冬的黑熊,其新陈代谢降至基础速率的25%,而核心体温(T(b))从37至38摄氏度降至冬眠中期平均33摄氏度。T(b)在30至36摄氏度范围内形成1.6至7.3天长度的周期,无昼夜节律成分。尽管熊会避免T(b)低于30摄氏度,且预计在更寒冷条件下更高的热损失率会导致周期更短,但我们尚不清楚T(b)周期背后的机制或功能。为了验证这一点,我们对12只体重在35.5至116.5千克的冬眠熊的洞穴温度(T(den))进行了操控,同时记录T(b)、代谢率(M)和颤抖情况。随着T(den)降低,T(b)周期长度(0.8至11.2天)缩短(偏相关系数R(2)=0.490,p<0.001)。与热导率(TC)高的小熊相比,热导率低的大熊的T(b)周期长度随T(den)变化的差异更大。各周期的最低T(b)并不一致。在低温T(den)时,熊在T(b)周期的上升和下降阶段都会颤抖,在T(b)下降最快时颤抖最少。在较高的T(den)时,T(b)模式更不规则。在低于较低临界温度(1.4至10.4摄氏度)时,整个T(b)周期的平均M与T(den)呈负相关。冬眠中期的最低M(0.3509瓦/千克±0.0121标准误)与体重成比例[M(瓦)=1.217×体重(千克)(0.6979),R(2)=0.855,p<0.001]。冬眠热导率(TC)与体重呈负相关(R(2)=0.721,p<0.001);热导率高的熊与热导率低的熊具有相同的T(b)周期长度,除了在高温T(den)时,因此不支持仅冷却速率决定T(b)周期长度这一假设。我们得出结论,T(b)循环受体温调节产热控制影响,当冬眠熊采用被动体温调节时可能不存在T(b)循环。在周期上升阶段更剧烈的颤抖可能有助于预防肌肉废用性萎缩。在寒冷条件下冬眠的熊在冬眠期间比在温暖条件下消耗更多能量。在T(den)低于较低临界温度时,与保持稳定的T(b)相比,T(b)循环不会导致额外的能量消耗。