School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;76(1):32-8; quiz 39. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09293.
In a prior study of bipolar disorder pedigrees, we demonstrated distinct clinical differences between depressive episodes in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder (MDD), including differentiation between these conditions using the Probabilistic Approach to Bipolar Depression. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the phenomenology of the most severe lifetime depressive episodes between bipolar I (BP-I) and II (BP-II) disorder subtypes and MDD in these pedigrees.
Patients with DSM-IV diagnoses of BP-I (n = 202), BP-II (n = 44), and MDD (n = 120) from bipolar disorder pedigrees were assessed using the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies between 1998 and 2012. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify distinguishing clinical features. The utility of the Probabilistic Approach in distinguishing BP-I and BP-II depression from MDD was assessed.
BP-I differed from MDD in terms of greater rates of psychomotor retardation (P < .05) and psychotic features (P < .05). BP-II was distinguished from MDD (P < .01) by the greater likelihood of mixed features. Patients with BP-II had a greater likelihood of mixed features (P < .001) and a lesser likelihood of psychomotor retardation (P < .05) compared to those with BP-I. The Probabilistic Approach significantly differentiated both BP-I and BP-II from MDD (P < .01 to P < .001, depending on cutoff) but did not robustly distinguish between BP-I and BP-II.
First, the differentiation of BP-II from both BP-I depression and MDD in terms of the presence of mixed symptoms is of particular interest given the current debate over "mixed specifiers" for these conditions in DSM-5. Second, the Probabilistic Approach to Bipolar Depression was demonstrated for the first time to significantly distinguish both bipolar disorder subtypes from MDD.
在先前的双相情感障碍谱系家族研究中,我们展示了双相情感障碍和重性抑郁障碍(MDD)中抑郁发作之间的明显临床差异,包括使用双相抑郁概率方法对这些情况进行区分。本回顾性研究的目的是比较这些家族中双相 I 型(BP-I)和 II 型(BP-II)障碍亚型和 MDD 中最严重的一生中抑郁发作的现象学。
1998 年至 2012 年间,使用遗传研究诊断访谈对来自双相情感障碍谱系的 DSM-IV 诊断为 BP-I(n = 202)、BP-II(n = 44)和 MDD(n = 120)的患者进行评估。使用多元逻辑回归识别区分临床特征。评估概率方法在区分 BP-I 和 BP-II 抑郁与 MDD 的效用。
BP-I 与 MDD 相比,精神运动迟缓和精神病特征的发生率更高(P <.05)。BP-II 与 MDD 的区别在于混合特征的可能性更大(P <.01)。与 BP-I 相比,BP-II 患者更有可能出现混合特征(P <.001)和精神运动迟滞的可能性较小(P <.05)。概率方法显著区分了 BP-I 和 BP-II 与 MDD(取决于截止值,P <.01 至 P <.001),但不能可靠地区分 BP-I 和 BP-II。
首先,鉴于当前关于 DSM-5 中这些条件的“混合特征”的争论,从存在混合症状的角度来看,BP-II 与 BP-I 抑郁和 MDD 的区分尤其有趣。其次,首次证明了双相抑郁概率方法能够显著区分这两种双相障碍亚型与 MDD。